摘要
2023年是“一带一路”倡议提出十周年。自提出以来,“一带一路”倡议得到越来越多国际组织和国家的响应。“一带一路”的高质量发展离不开有力的司法保障。为此,中国在2018年设立了中国国际商事法庭,以解决“一带一路”相关商事案件。经过近5年的建设,中国国际商事法庭建成了多平台的、创新的运行机制,包括完备的组织体系、可行的程序规则和充分的保障体系,如设立“一站式”纠纷解决平台、成立专家委员会、建设外国法查明平台等。这些举措对于妥善解决涉“一带一路”国际商事案件、维护我国当事人的合法权益、保障“一带一路”行稳致远发挥了重要作用。但通过对中国国际商事法庭运行实践的考察,可以看出,中国国际商事法庭还可以进一步完善。在现有框架体系下,可以通过修改或采纳相关支持性法律制度如采用更加宽松的管辖权制度、采用主权相对豁免制度、便利的判决承认和执行制度等,更好地推动中国国际商事法庭的工作。
The Belt and Road Initiative will mark its 10th anniversary in 2023 and has received more and more acceptance and recognition from various international organizations and countries.The high-quality development of the Belt and Road needs strong judicial protection.To this end,the CICC was set up in 2018 to resolve the commercial disputes related to the development of the Belt and Road.After nearly five years of its establishment,the CICC has established a multi-platform and innovative operational mechanism,including a sound organizational system,a set of feasible procedural rules and an adequate supportive system,such as the establishment of the'one-stop'diversified dispute resolution platform,the International Commercial Expert Committee,as well as the foreign law ascertainment platforms.These measures have played an important role in properly resolving the international commercial disputes arising from the Belt and Road,safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the Chinese parties,and ensuring the steady and long-term development of the Belt and Road Initiative.However,through the survey of the judicial practices of the CICC and the analysis of the features of the commercial disputes arising from the Belt and Road countries,it can be further improved.The work of the CICC can be better promoted by modifying or adopting more relevant supportive legal systems,such as the adoption of a wider jurisdictional base,the doctrine of restrictive sovereign immunity,as well as the design of a more convenient recognition and enforcement mechanism of foreign judgments.
作者
朱伟东
Zhu Weidong(the Center for African Laws,the China-Africa Institute,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)
