研究生学术论文选题、审视评判与投稿——基于导师—编辑双重视角

Topic Selection,Evaluation and Submission of Academic Paper—From theSupervisor and Editor Dual Perspective

在学术论文从选题到发表的过程中,指导教师和期刊编辑从不同角度发挥着重要作用,然而角色不同则易产生观点差异,如何遵从双边引导成为亟待解决的问题。以“论文选题、撰写与评判、投稿”为议题,在如何确定优秀论文选题、学术论文语言表达及其价值评判、投稿与返修注意事项等方面进行论述,基于研究生导师和编辑在上述各环节中不同的考量角度,剖析了不同视角下易产生的冲突及其成因,进一步指出在科研过程中应融合发挥导师与编辑的不同职责,多角度、多角色、多层次地对学术论文进行审视和质量评价。

During the processes from the selection of research topic to the publication of academic papers,the supervisor and journal editor play important roles from various perspectives,which may lead to conflicts of views.Therefore,how to follow the bilateral guidance and balance the contradictions has become an urgent issue to be solved.With the topic of research topic selection,paper writing and evaluation and paper submission,this paper discusses from the perspectives of supervisor and editor on how to determine the excellent scientific research topic,the academic expression of scientific papers and their academic value evaluation,and the submission and revision.Based on the different consideration angles of supervisor and editor in the above processes,the paper analyzes the conflicts and their causes from the two perspectives,and further points out that during the process of scientific research,the different responsibilities of supervisor and editor should be combined to review and evaluate the quality of academic papers from multiple angles,roles and levels.