期刊文献+

FOCUS-PDCA持续质量改进模式护理在肝癌介入治疗患者中的应用效果

Application effects of FOCUS-PDCA continuous quality improvement model nursing in patients with liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察FOCUS-PDCA持续质量改进模式护理在肝癌介入治疗患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2020年6月至2022年6月该院收治的114例肝癌患者进行前瞻性研究,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组各57例。对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用FOCUS-PDCA持续质量改进模式护理,比较两组护理前后疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分表(VAS)]评分、负性情绪[汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)]评分、睡眠质量[匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)]评分、并发症发生率、生命质量[肝癌患者生命质量测定量表(QOL-LC)]评分和护理满意度。结果:护理后,两组VAS评分均低于护理前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组HAMA、HAMD评分均低于护理前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组入睡时间、睡眠质量、睡眠效率、睡眠时间、睡眠紊乱、催眠药物、日间功能等PSQI评分均低于护理前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组躯体功能、心理功能、社会功能、症状不良反应等QOL-LC评分均高于护理前,且观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组护理满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:FCUS-PDCA持续质量改进模式护理应用于肝癌介入治疗患者可提高生命质量评分,降低疼痛程度评分、负性情绪评分、睡眠质量评分和并发症发生率,其效果优于常规护理。 Objective:To observe application effects of FOCUS-PDCA continuous quality improvement model nursing in patients with liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy.Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 114 patients with liver cancer admitted to this hospital from June 2020 to June 2022.They were divided into control group and observation group according to the random number table method,57 cases in each group.The control group was treated with routine nursing,while the observation group was treated with FOCUS-PDCA continuous quality improvement model nursing.The pain degree[visual analogue scale(VAS)]score,the negative emotion[Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA),Hamilton depression scale(HAMD)]score,the sleep quality[Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale(PSQI)]score,the incidence of complications,the quality of life[quality of life scale for patients with liver cancer(QOL-LC)]score,and the nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after the nursing.Results:After the nursing,the VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before the nursing,that in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The HAMA and HAMD scores of the two groups were lower than those before the nursing,those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The PSQI scores of falling sleep time,sleep quality,sleep efficiency,sleep time,sleep disorder,hypnotic drugs and daytime function in the two groups were lower than those before the nursing,those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The QOL-LC scores of physical function,psychological function,social function,symptoms and adverse reactions in the two groups were higher than those before the nursing,and those in the observation group were higher than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Further,the nursing satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:The FCUS-PDCA continuous quality improvement model nursing in the patients with liver cancer undergoing interventional therapy can improve the quality of life scores and reduce the pain degree scores,the negative emotion scores,the sleep quality scores and the incidence of complications.Moreover,it is superior to the routine nursing.
作者 龚跃先 朱晓果 GONG Yuexian;ZHU Xiaoguo(Third Ward of Oncology Department of Nanyang Central Hospital,Nanyang 473000 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2023年第19期175-178,共4页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 肝癌 介入治疗 FOCUS-PDCA持续质量改进模式护理 疼痛 生命质量 睡眠质量 并发症 Liver cancer Interventional therapy FOCUS-PDCA continuous quality improvement model nursing Pain Quality of life Sleep quality Complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献130

  • 1万崇华,方积乾,汤学良,张灿珍,卢玉波,孟琼,高丽.SF-36量表用于肝癌患者生活质量测定的效果评价[J].肿瘤,2005,25(5):492-494. 被引量:90
  • 2刘贤臣,唐茂芹,胡蕾,王爱祯,吴宏新,赵贵芳,高春霓,李万顺.匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的信度和效度研究[J].中华精神科杂志,1996,29(2):103-107. 被引量:3323
  • 3吴瑛.护理结局分类系统的意义与概况[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(6):567-569. 被引量:40
  • 4Ware IE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment(IQOLA)project. J Clin Epide- miol, 1998, 51(11): 903-912.
  • 5Sehipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, et al. Measuring the quality of Life of cancer patients: the functional living index: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984, 54(32): 472-483.
  • 6Wan C, Fang J, Yang Z, et al. Development and validation of a qual-I ity of life instrument for patients with liver cancer QOL-LC. Am Clin Oncol, 2010, 33(5): 448-455.
  • 7Wan C, Fang J, Yang Z, et al. Development andvalidation of a qual- ity of life instrument for patients with liver cancer QOL-LC. Am J Clin Oncol, 2010, 33(5): 448-455.
  • 8Heffernan N, Celia D, Webster K, et al. Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hepatobiliary Cancers: ~he Func- tional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2002, 20(9): 2229-2239.
  • 9Hobson P, Bhowmick B, Meara J, et al. Use of the SF-36 question- naire in cerebrovascular disease. Stroke, 1997, 28(2): 464-465.
  • 10Wible BC, Rilling WS, Drescher P, et al. Longitudinal quality of life assessment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after primary, transarterial chemoembolization.J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2010, 21(7): 1024-1030.

共引文献1897

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部