期刊文献+

量化评估策略下综合疼痛干预对宫颈癌根治术后患者疼痛及应激反应的影响 被引量:2

Effect of comprehensive pain intervention under quantitative evaluation strategy on postoperative pain and stress response of patients undergoing radical resection of cervical cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨量化评估策略下综合疼痛干预对宫颈癌根治术后患者疼痛及应激反应的影响。方法根据干预方式的不同将102例宫颈癌根治术患者分为对照组和观察组,每组51例,对照组患者采取常规围手术期干预,观察组患者在对照组的基础上给予量化评估策略下综合疼痛干预。比较两组患者的疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]、疼痛相关指标[一氧化氮(NO)、前列腺素E2(PGE2)及P物质(SP)]、应激反应指标[去甲肾上腺素(NE)、皮质醇(Cor)及促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)]。结果术后8、24、48 h,观察组患者的VAS评分均明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。术后24、48 h,观察组患者的NO、PGE2、SP、NE、Cor、ACTH水平均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。结论对宫颈癌根治术患者实施量化评估策略下综合疼痛干预效果良好,可有效减轻术后疼痛和应激反应。 Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive pain intervention under quantitative evaluation strategy on postoperative pain and stress response of patients undergoing radical resection of cervical cancer.Method A total of 102 patients undergoing radical resection of cervical cancer were divided into the control group(n=51,received routine perioperative intervention)and the observation group(n=51,received comprehensive pain intervention under the quantitative evaluation strategy on the basis of control group)according to different intervention methods.The pain degree[visual analogue scale(VAS)],pain related indicators[nitric oxide(NO),prostaglandin E2(PGE2)and substance P(SP)],stress response indicators[norepinephrine(NE),cortisol(Cor)and adrenocorticotropic hormone(ACTH)]were compared between the two groups.Result Eight,twenty-four,and forty-eight hours after surgery,the VAS scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.01).Twenty-four and forty-eight hours after surgery,the levels of NO,PGE2,SP,NE,Cor and ACTH in the observation were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of comprehensive pain intervention under the quantitative evaluation strategy is significant for patients undergoing radical resection of cervical cancer,which can reduce the postoperative pain and stress response of patients.
作者 张志飞 刘梦珂 胡泽敏 索莉娜 ZHANG Zhifei;LIU Mengke;HU Zemin;SUO Li’na(International Medical Center,He’nan Provincial People’s Hospital,People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,He’nan,China)
出处 《癌症进展》 2023年第16期1786-1788,1806,共4页 Oncology Progress
基金 2021年河南省医学科技攻关省部共建重点项目(SBGJ202102012)。
关键词 量化评估策略 综合疼痛干预 宫颈癌根治术 疼痛 应激反应 quantitative evaluation strategy comprehensive pain intervention radical resection of cervical cancer pain stress response
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献158

  • 1辛碧瑶.快速康复护理模式在60例宫颈癌手术护理中的应用效果[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2019,0(24):144-145. 被引量:3
  • 2王建平,陈海勇,苏文亮,蔺秀云.简式简明心境问卷在癌症病人应用中的信、效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(6):404-407. 被引量:114
  • 3凌斌.子宫颈癌诊断与治疗的新进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(1):23-25. 被引量:66
  • 4Jemal A,Siegel R,Ward E. Cancer Statistics,2007[J].{H}CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2007.43-66.
  • 5Howe HL,Wu X,Ries LA. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer,1975-2003,featuring cancer among U.S.Hispanic/Latino populations[J].{H}CANCER,2006,(08):1711-1742.
  • 6Sherman ME,Wang SS,Carreon J. Mortality trends for cervical squamous and adenocarcinoma in the United States.Relation to incidence and survival[J].{H}CANCER,2005,(06):1258-1264.
  • 7Parkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics,2002[J].{H}CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2005.74-108.
  • 8Kamangar F,Dores GM,Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence,mortality,and prevalence across five continents:defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world[J].{H}Journal of Clinical Oncology,2006,(14):2137-2150.
  • 9Villa LL,Costa RL,Petta CA. Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus(types 6,11,16,and 18)L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women:a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efifcacy trial[J].{H}LANCET ONCOLOGY,2005.271-278.
  • 10Ault KA,Future II Study Group. Effect of prophylactic human papillomavirus L1 virus-like-particle vaccine on risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2,grade 3,and adenocarcinoma in situ:a combined analysis of four randomised clinical trials[J].{H}LANCET,2007,(9576):1861-1868.

共引文献438

同被引文献23

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部