期刊文献+

血清miR-378a-5p水平联合微血流成像的超声多模态检查对肝癌疾病进展与微血管侵犯的评估价值 被引量:1

The Value of Multimodal Ultrasound Examination of Serum Mir-378A-5p Level Combined with Microflow Imaging for The Evaluation of Liver Cancer Disease Progression and Microvascular Invasion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清miR-378a-5p水平联合微血流成像的超声多模态检查对肝癌疾病(HCC)进展与微血管侵犯(MVI)的评估价值。方法选取HCC患者100例作为研究对象,根据诊断结果分为MVI组(n=60)、非MVI组(n=40)。应用实时荧光定量PCR法检测血清miR-378a-5p mRNA相对表达量;应用Philips彩超诊断仪进行微血流成像的超声多模态检查。分析HCC不同分期血清指标和超声表现差异;将MVI的危险因素进行单因素分析,将甲胎蛋白(AFP)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、miR-378a-5p进行多因素Logistic回归分析,分析血清miR-378a-5p、联合微血流成像的超声多模态检查单独及联合检测对MVI预测价值。结果HCCⅠ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期动脉相、门脉相造影及血清miR-378a-5p水平比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);单因素分析显示,两组性别、年龄、体质量、肿瘤位置比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);MVI组包膜破损、无包膜、微血流Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、门脉相高增强、肿瘤不光滑边缘、AFP、CEA、miR-378a-5p、SBP、DBP高于非MVI组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,血清CEA、微血流分级、miR-378a-5p为发生MVI的独立危险因素(P<0.05);ROC结果显示,血清miR-378a-5p、联合微血流成像的超声多模态检查单独预测MVI的最佳截断点分别为2.655 ng/mL、44.35μg/mL,单独及联合预测MVI预后不良的AUC分别为0.731、0.697、0.852。结论HCC患者不同分期超声表现及血清miR-378a-5p水平不同,且MVI患者血清miR-378a-5p低表达,血清miR-378a-5p联合微血流成像的超声多模态检查对早期MVI检测具有较高诊断价值。 Objective To investigate the value of multimodal ultrasound examination of serum Mir-378A-5p combined with microflow imaging for the evaluation of progression of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)and microvascular invasion(MVI).Methods 100 HCC patients were selected as the subjects of this study,and were divided into MVI group(n=60)and non-MVI group(n=40)according to the diagnosis results.The relative expression of serum miR-378a-5p mRNA was detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR.The risk factors of MVI were analyzed by univariate analysis,and AFP,CEA and miR-378a-5p were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression analysis.The predictive value of serum miR-378a-5p and ultrasonic multimodal examination combined with microflow imaging alone and in combination was analyzed.Results There were statistically significant differences in arterial and portal angiography and serum miR-378a-5p levels of HCC stageⅠ,ⅡandⅢ(P<0.05).Univariate analysis showed that there were no significant differences in gender,age,body weight and tumor location between the two groups(P>0.05).MVI group was significantly higher than non-MVI group in terms of capsule damage,no capsule,single-nodular type,multi-nodular type,tumor maximum diameter,non-smooth edge,AFP,CEA,Mir-378A-5p,SBP and DBP,with statistical significance(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that serum CEA,ultrasound multimodal examination of microflow imaging and Mir-378A-5p were independent risk factors for MVI(P<0.05).ROC results showed that the optimal cut-off points of serum miR-378a-5p and ultrasonic multimode examination combined with microflow imaging were 2.655 ng/mL and 44.35μg/mL,respectively,and the AUC of poor prognosis of MVI were 0.731,0.697 and 0.852,respectively.Conclusion The ultrasound manifestations and serum miR-378a-5p levels are different in DIFFERENT stages of HCC patients,and the low expression of serum miR-378a-5p in MVI patients.Ultrasound multimodal examination of serum Mir-378A-5P combined with microflow imaging has high diagnostic value for early DETECTION of MVI.
作者 王爱霞 张东锋 WANG Aixia;ZHANG Dongfeng(Zhengzhou Yihe Hospital,Zhengzhou,450000)
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2023年第10期1677-1681,共5页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
基金 河南省医学科技攻关计划联合项目(编号:LHGJ20191155)。
关键词 肝癌疾病 微血管侵犯 miR-378a-5p 微血流成像的超声多模态 评估价值 Hepatocellular carcinoma Microvascular invasion miR-378a-5p Ultrasonic multimodal microflow imaging Assessed value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献92

  • 1Zheng-Gui Du,Yong-Gang Wei,Ke-Fei Chen,Bo Li.Risk factors associated with early and late recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a single institution's experience with 398 consecutive patients[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2014,13(2):153-161. 被引量:20
  • 2李刚,郑东海,吴孟超.原发性肝癌术后复发转移的相关因素分析[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(04Z):33-34. 被引量:7
  • 3吴孟超.应重视小肝癌的诊断与治疗[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(30):2089-2091. 被引量:11
  • 4丛文铭,董 辉,冼志红. 肝脏和肝内胆管系统肿瘤[M]//吴秉铨,刘彦仿. 免疫组织化学病理诊断. 2版. 北京:北京科学技术出版社, 2013:334-45.
  • 5KOH C, ZHAO X, SAMALA N, et al. AASLD clinical practice guidelines: a critical review of scientific evidence and evolving recommendations[J]. Hepatology, 2013, 58(6): 2142-2152.
  • 6WILLIAM H, RALPH H, TIMOTHY H, et al. Surgical patholo- gy dissection : an illustrated guide[ M ]. New York : Springer, 2003 : 7 -9.
  • 7中华医学会临床技术操作规范·病理学分册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2004:27-41.
  • 8BASS BP, ENGEL KB, GREYTAK SR, et al. A review of pre- analytical factors affecting molecular, protein, and morpho- logical analysis of formalin -fixed, paraffin - embedded ( FF- PE) tissue., how well do you know your FFPE specimen? [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2014, 138(11 ) : 1520 -1530.
  • 9LU XY, XI T, LAU WY, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma ex- pressing cholangiocyte phenotype is a novel subtype with highly aggressive behavior[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18 (8) : 2210 -2217.
  • 10CAI SW, YANG SZ, GAO J, et al. Prognostic significance of mast cell count following curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(4): 576 -584.

共引文献189

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部