期刊文献+

谁来做选择?选择对学龄前儿童分享行为及感受的影响

Who makes the choice?The influence of choice on preschoolers’sharing behaviors and feelings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文探究选择对学龄前儿童分享行为及感受的影响。实验1将儿童随机分配到3个条件(儿童自己选择、母亲选择和主试选择是否分享贴纸),测量儿童的主观感受以及在新情境中的分享行为,儿童母亲填写母子关系质量问卷。结果发现,母子关系质量调节了选择条件对儿童分享感受的影响。实验2采用类似的方法探究母亲选择时是否提供合理理由对儿童分享的影响。发现,尽管在当下的情境中儿童都遵循母亲的选择,但在后续的新情境中,儿童在母亲给出合理理由时比没有合理理由时表现出更多的分享行为。这些结果表明,母亲做选择并不一定会降低分享行为和感受,积极母子关系和合理的理由对于母亲做选择时儿童的分享动机有一定的保护作用。 The development of prosocial behaviors(e.g.,helping,sharing)is an important part of children’s moral development.Previous research has indicated that the freedom to make choices(whether children make choices for themselves or other people make choices for them)has an important impact on children’s prosocial motivation and behaviors.However,little research has investigated the impact of the relatedness between the child and the adult who makes the choices,or the provision of reasonable explanations on children’s prosocial behaviors.Therefore,across two studies,we investigated how,one,the freedom to make choices,two,the relatedness between children and the adults who make choices for them,and/or three,the provision of reasonable explanations for those choices,may influence children’s prosocial motivation and behaviors.We conducted both studies with children aged 4~5 in China.In Study 1,children were asked to make decisions about sharing stickers with a puppet.They were randomly assigned to one of three choice conditions:self-choice,mother-choice,and experimenter-choice.In the self-choice condition,the child could decide for themselves whether to share with a puppet or not;in the mother-choice condition,the child’s mother instructed the child to share,and in the experimenter-choice condition,the experimenter instructed the child to share.After this,we measured children’s feelings during the sharing task,and their sharing behaviors towards a novel partner.Meanwhile,mothers in the self-choice and the mother-choice conditions completed a questionnaire measuring child-mother relatedness.We found that although there was no overall significant difference in children’s sharing behaviors or feelings across the three conditions,mother-child relatedness significantly moderated the effect of choice condition on children’s sharing feelings.Children who had positive relationships with their mothers demonstrated positive feelings when their mothers made the choice for them,similar to when they made the choice themselves.However,those who had neutral or negative relationships with their mothers,demonstrated worse feelings when their mothers made the choice for them compared to when they made the choice themselves.In Study 2,we employed similar methods,but used the following three conditions:the self-choice condition,the mother reasonable-choice condition(where the mother provided a reasonable explanation for the choice)and the mother unreasonable-choice condition(where the mother forced the child to share without providing a reason).We found that,when sharing with the first puppet,children were significantly more likely to share in the mother reasonable-choice and mother unreasonable-choice conditions than in the self-choice condition.However,when sharing with a new puppet,children in the mother reasonable-choice condition shared more stickers than those in the self-choice condition or the mother unreasonable-choice condition.Taken together,these two studies show that children’s prosocial motivations do not necessarily decrease when others make choices for them.Instead,for children positively connected with their mothers,following their mother’s choices can lead to positive feelings to a similar degree as those experienced when making choices themselves.Additionally,mothers’reasonable choices and guidance can facilitate subsequent sharing behaviors.The findings of this study have significant implications about the development of preschoolers'prosocial motivation.
作者 吴文清 张沁圆 赵欣 WU Wenqing;ZHANG Qinyuan;ZHAO Xin(School of Psychology and Cognitive Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China;School of Education,Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai,Zhuhai,519087,China;Teachers College,Columbia University,New York,NY10027,America;Department of Educational Psychology,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China)
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2023年第11期1815-1826,共12页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(32100865) 上海市教育发展基金会和上海市教育委员会“晨光计划”项目(22CGA28)资助。
关键词 亲社会动机 选择 分享 社会认知发展 学龄前儿童发展 prosocial motivation choice sharing social cognitive development early childhood development
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献101

  • 1陈文锋,张建新.积极/消极情感量表中文版的结构和效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(11):763-765. 被引量:118
  • 2张萍.(2012).感恩情感的形成机制及其千预(博士学位 论文).上海师范大学.
  • 3Aknin, L. B,,Barrington-Leigh, C. P” Dunn, E. W” Helliwell, J. F.,Bums, J., Biswas-Diener, R”... Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, J04(4),635-652.
  • 4Algoe, S. B” Haidt,J.,& Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 5(3),425-429.
  • 5Ames, D. R., Flynn, F. J., & Weber, E. U. (2004). It’s the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 461-474.
  • 6Bao, X. H.,& Lam, S. F. (2008). Who makes the choice. Rethinking the role of autonomy and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. Child Development, 79(2), 269-283.
  • 7Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 77(4), 319-325.
  • 8Batson, C. D., Coke, J. S., Jasnoski, M. L.,& Hanson, M.(1978). Buying kindness: Effect of an extrinsic incentive for helping on perceived altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(1), 86-91.
  • 9Binder, M.,& Freytag, A. (2013). Volunteering, subjective well-being and public policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34(1), 97-119.
  • 10Caprara, G. V.,& Steca, P. (2006). The contribution of self-regulatory efficacy beliefs in managing affect and family relationships to positive thinking and hedonic balance. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(6), 603-627.

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部