期刊文献+

客户企业创新驱动了上游企业探索式创新吗?——创新的反向传导效应研究 被引量:3

Does the Innovation of Customer Enterprises Drive the Exploratory Innovation of Upstream Enterprises?A Study on the Reverse Transmission Effect of Innovation
原文传递
导出
摘要 供应链网络中,下游客户企业和上游供应商的创新行为相互关联。本文通过匹配中国上市公司和非上市公司数据,研究分析供应链网络中“自下而上”的反向创新传导效应。研究发现:(1)客户企业创新会向上游反向传导,对上游企业的探索式创新有促进作用;(2)在市场需求诱导机制的作用下,客户企业创新通过提升自身议价能力和提出更高、更稳定的产品技术需求,促进上游企业的探索式创新;(3)在技术知识扩散机制的作用下,客户企业创新显著提升上游企业知识技术能力的多元化程度,促进上游企业的探索式创新。进一步的研究发现:创新传导效应具有一定的方向性,不存在“自上而下”的探索式创新传导效应。而且,当上游企业响应市场需求的能力更强或者知识全局凝聚性更低、局部凝聚性更高时,以及客户企业与上游企业地理距离较远、客户企业所在行业信息环境较好时,创新的传导效应更强。本研究为企业充分挖掘供应链关联的创新效应和探究探索式创新的新路径,提供了理论依据和政策启示。 In the supply chain network,the innovation behaviors of downstream customer enterprises and upstream suppliers are interrelated.By matching the data of Chinese listed companies and non-listed companies,this paper studies the“bottom-up”reverse innovation transmission effect in the supply chain network.The results show that:First,customer enterprise innovation will conduct in the upstream direction,which has a significant and positive impact on the exploratory innovation of upstream enterprises.Second,under the effect of market demand induction mechanism,customer enterprise innovation promotes the exploratory innovation of upstream enterprises by improving their own bargaining power and putting forward higher and more stable requirements of product technology.Third,under the effect of technological knowledge diffusion mechanism,customer enterprise innovation significantly improves the diversification level of upstream enterprises’knowledge and technological capabilities,and thus promotes the exploratory innovation of upstream enterprises.Further research finds that the innovation transmission effect has certain directionality,and there is no“top-down”transmission effect in exploratory innovation.Moreover,when upstream enterprises have stronger ability to respond to market demand,the global cohesion of knowledge is lower,or the local cohesion is higher,the innovation transmission effect is stronger.When customer enterprises are geographically far away from upstream enterprises,or the information environment of the industry where customer enterprises are located is better,the innovation transmission effect is stronger.The main contributions of this paper are as follows:First,from the micro-enterprise perspective of the supply chain network,it combines the supply chain network with exploratory innovation and focuses on the“bottom-up”innovation transmission effect,forming a new perspective for studying enterprise innovation.Second,it conducts innovation research through the methods of“enterprise to enterprise”and“point to point”and constructs a matching sample of“upstream target enterprises–downstream customer enterprises”by matching the supply chain database with the patent database,which not only expands the number of samples and obtains patent information that can directly reflect the innovation level of customer enterprises,but also better controls the characteristics of affected enterprises and more accurately identifies the innovation transmission effect.Third,from the perspectives of market demand induction and technological knowledge diffusion,it empirically tests the transmission mechanism of exploratory innovation in the supply chain network at multiple levels,enriching and deepening the research on the mechanism behind innovation correlations.
作者 肖利平 刘点仪 Xiao Liping;Liu Dianyi(Center for Economic Development Research,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;Economics and Management School,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;Shenzhen Branch,Industrial and Commercial Bank of China,Shenzhen 518041,China)
出处 《外国经济与管理》 北大核心 2023年第8期83-100,共18页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BJL083) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地武汉大学经济发展研究中心“十四五”自主科研项目(23CEDRZ01)。
关键词 探索式创新 供应链网络 客户需求 知识扩散 企业创新 exploratory innovation supply chain network customer demand knowledge diffusion enterprise innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献149

  • 1董静,赵国振,陈文锋.风险投资的介入会影响创业企业的商业模式吗?[J].外国经济与管理,2021(4):64-84. 被引量:10
  • 2王泓略,曾德明,陈培帧.企业知识重组对技术创新绩效的影响:知识基础关系特征的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2020,0(1):53-61. 被引量:40
  • 3夏立军,方轶强.政府控制、治理环境与公司价值——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].经济研究,2005,40(5):40-51. 被引量:1075
  • 4Hoppe, H. C., I. H. Lee. Entry Deterrence and Innovation in Durable Goods Monopoly[C]. Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers, 2000.
  • 5Vossen, R. W. Market Power, Industrial Concentration and Innovative Activity[J]. Review of Industrial Organization 1999,15(4):367- 378.
  • 6Blundell, R., R. Griffith, J. van Reenen. Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1999,6(3):529-554.
  • 7Scherer, F. M. Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers[J]. American Economic Review, 1967,57(3):524- 531.
  • 8Scott, J. T. Firm versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
  • 9Farber, S. Buyer Market Structure and R&D Effort: A Simultaneous Equations Model [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1981,62(3):336-345.
  • 10Klepper, S. Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle[J]. American Economic Review, 1996,86(3):562-583.

共引文献351

同被引文献77

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部