期刊文献+

抗菌药物管理评价指标和评估方法研究进展 被引量:1

Research Progress on Evaluation Outcomes and Study Designs of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs
原文传递
导出
摘要 抗菌药物管理项目(antimicrobial stewardship program,ASP)是一项由多学科医疗团队干预抗菌药物使用以促进抗菌药物合理使用、保障医疗质量和医疗安全的干预项目。随着抗菌药物管理的开展,确定合适的评价方法和评价指标作为证明ASP干预措施有效性至关重要。笔者通过查阅梳理国内外抗菌药物管理政策效果评价领域的相关文献,对不同评价指标与评价方法等方面进行了综述。总结了ASP主要的4个指标:临床结局指标、微生物指标、过程指标、经济学效益,以及包括随机对照试验、随机整群对照试验、中断时间序列分析、Meta分析等ASP的评价方法,为进一步完善抗菌药物管理政策提供参考,也为后续相关研究提供方向和依据。 The Antimicrobial Stewardship Program(ASP)is a work in which multidisciplinary medical teams intervene in the use of antibacterial drugs to promote rational clinical drug use and ensure medical quality and safety.With the development of antimicrobial management,it is very important to determine appropriate evaluation methods and outcomes to prove the effectiveness of ASP interventions.This paper reviews different evaluation indicators and methods by reviewing the relevant literature in the field of evaluation of the effectiveness of antimicrobial drug management policies at home and abroad.This paper summarizes the four main outcomes of ASP:clinical outcomes,microbial outcomes,process outcomes,economic outcomes,and methodology,including randomized controlled trials,randomized cluster controlled trial,interruption time series analysis and meta analysis.This paper could provide reference for further improving the management policy of ASP,and also provide direction and basis for subsequent related research.
作者 吴嘉昱 杨阳 左玮 于佳鑫 乔露瑶 张波 WU Jia-yu;YANG Yang;ZUO Wei;YU Jia-xin;QIAO Lu-yao;ZHANG Bo(Department of Pharmacy,State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;Institute of Medicine,Peking Union Medical College,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100050,China)
出处 《中国药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第15期1349-1354,共6页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 中央高水平医院临床科研业务费资助(2022-PUMCH-B-059)。
关键词 抗菌药物管理项目 干预 效果 评价指标 评估方法 ASP intervention effect outcome methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献59

共引文献112

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部