期刊文献+

生成式人工智能中的“责任”问题及成因探析——基于身体的视角 被引量:2

The"Responsibility"Problem of AIGC and Its Reasons——From the Perspective of Body
原文传递
导出
摘要 生成式人工智能(AIGC)对传统责任归因机制产生了新的挑战,以往对于责任的讨论主要从责任的构成条件上来分析,而遗忘了责任机制存在的根本前提在于“身体”。以“身体”的“有死性”和“有限性”作为探讨责任的根基可以得出,AIGC在责任归因上与人类的根本不同之处在于,前者不具备“身体”的消亡以及对生命之“畏”,而后者则具有“有死性”的身体以及知道自己为“有死者”,这使得AIGC不具有“可问责性”。在人工智能没有“觉醒”之前,责任只能在人类行动者之间进行分配。另外,AIGC与其他技术的不同之处在于,责任基本上由技术的“提供者”来承担。 AIGC has brought a new challenge to the traditional attribution mechanism of responsibility.In the past,the discussion of responsibility are mainly from the composing conditions of responsibility,but forgot that the fundamental premise of the existence of responsibility mechanism is"body".From the"mortality"of"body"as the basis for discussing responsibility,it can be concluded that the fundamental difference between AIGC and human in the attribution of responsibility lies in that,the former does not have the"fear"of life and the death of body,but the later has a perishable body and he knows he will die,which makes AIGC not"accountable".Before the“awakening”of AI,responsibilities can only be distributed among human actors.In addition,the differences between AIGC and other technologies lies in that,the responsibility is essentially on the"provider"of the technology.
作者 张卫 黄成驰 Zhang Wei;Huang Chengchi
出处 《图书馆建设》 北大核心 2023年第4期15-18,共4页 Library Development
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“大数据环境下信息价值开发的伦理约束机制研究”,项目编号:17ZDA023 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目“儒家技术伦理思想研究”,项目编号:DUT23RC(3)004的阶段性成果。
关键词 生成式人工智能 责任 身体 AIGC Responsibility Body
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献17

  • 1[德]海德格尔 陈嘉映 王庆节译.存在与时间[M].北京:三联书店,1987..
  • 2[德]海德格尔.海德格尔选集[M].上海:上海三联书店,1996.947.
  • 3[德]吕迪格尔·萨弗兰斯基.海德格尔传[M].北京:商务印书馆.1999.259.
  • 4[英]杰夫·科林斯.海德格尔与纳粹[M].赵成文译.北京:北京大学出版社.2005:16.
  • 5David Levy, Hans Jonas: the Integrity of Thinking, University of Missouri Press, 2002, p. 80.
  • 6Hans Jonas, "Gnosticism and Modern Nihilism", Social Research. 19:1/4 (1952), pp. 430-452.
  • 7Hans Jonas, Mortality and Morality : A Search for the Good after Auschwitz, Northwestern University Press, 1996, pp. 46-47.
  • 8Hans Jonas. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chicago Press, 1984,p. 107.
  • 9Hans Jonas, The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology, Northwestern University Press, 2001, p. xxiii.
  • 10Yotam Hotam, "Overcoming the Mentor: Heidegger's Present and the Presence of Heidegger in Karl Lowith's and Hans Jonas' Postwar Thought", History of European Ideas, 35 (2009), pp. 253-264.

共引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部