摘要
“双减”督导常态化是推动“双减”政策长效落地的重要举措,也是建设现代教育治理体系的关键一环。面对新时代教育督导体制机制改革与“双减”督导常态化实施的双重要求,目前,“双减”督导存在定位不清、效果评估监测内容缺位、参与主体单一、督导方法经验偏向等诸多问题和挑战,亟需厘清“双减”督导的价值定位,明确谁来督导、督导什么以及怎么督导等关键问题。应基于“减负增效”的目标指向,准确把握“双减”督导定位,分层分类构建督导评估指标体系,积极探索多元主体共治机制,并充分利用大数据等信息技术推动督导方法创新,提升督导结果精准性与权威性,保障“双减”督导常态化运行。
The normalization of“double reduction”supervision is an important measure to promote the long-term implementation of“double reduction”policy,and it is also a key step for the construction of modern education governance system.With the requirements of mechanism reform of education supervision system and the normalization of“double reduction”supervision in the new era,a series of problems and challenges have arisen,such as unclear orientation,the absence of effect evaluation and monitoring content,a unitary participant,supervision experience bias,etc.It urgently needs to clear up the value orientation of“double reduction”supervision,and clarify the key issues such as who will supervise,what to supervise,and how to supervise.It is recommended that based on the goal of“burden reduction and efficiency increasing”,we should accurately retain the strategic position of“double reduction”,build supervision and evaluation index systems through hierarchical classification,actively explore mechanisms for governance by diversified entities,and make full use of ICT such as big data to promote the innovation of supervision methods,improve the accuracy and authority of supervision results,and ensure the normal operation of“double reduction”supervision.
作者
蒋龙艳
谢静
辛涛
JIANG Longyan;XIE Jing;XIN Tao(Beijing Institute of Educational Supervision and Evaluation,Beijing 100034;Faculty of Artificial Intelligence Education,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079;Collaborative Innovation Centre of Assessment for Basic Education Quality,BNU,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第5期53-58,共6页
Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金
北京市教育科学“十四五”规划2022年度重大课题“‘双减’背景下北京市义务教育高质量发展政策支持研究”(AAMA22001)。
关键词
“双减”督导
价值定位
关键问题
实践进路
“double reduction”supervision
value orientation
key issues
practical approaches