论笛卡尔在德国现象学中的处境以及马里翁的不满

On Descartes'Situation in German Phenomenology and Marion's Discontent

马里翁在其中文首发的文章中直面笛卡尔在德国现象学中的处境并首次明确地表达了自己的不满。马里翁穿梭于笛卡尔、胡塞尔和海德格尔的文本中,整理胡塞尔和海德格尔的批评,重估笛卡尔在现象学中的处境,为笛卡尔辩护,对胡塞尔和海德格尔展开反批评,其目的至少在于证明,现象学的某些基本操作不过是笛卡尔的某些环节的重复而已。但是,面对还原、现象性和意向性这三个在马里翁看来现象学和笛卡尔哲学所共有的基本操作或关键环节,我们的文本证据和学理分析表明,尽管笛卡尔对现象学的贡献在以前确实被低估了,但马里翁的辩护工作总体上是不成功的,因为在笛卡尔那里,还原不稳定,现象性不全面,意向性尚未出现。

When it came to Descartes'situation in German phenomenology,Jean-Luc Marion explicitly expressed his content in his article first published in Chinese.Marion conducts a shuttle reading of the texts between Descartes,Husserl and Heidegger,making an analysis of the criticism from Husserl and Heidegger and a revaluation of Descartes'situation in phenomenology while defending Descartes and carrying on the anti-criticism against Husserl and Heidegger with an aim to demonstrate at least that some of the basic phenomenological operatons are nothing but the repetition of some of Descartes'critical moments.But in the face of such basic operations or critical moments as reduction,phenomenality and intentionality,which are shared by phenomenology and Descartes'philosophy,our textual evidence and academic analysis show that Marion's defense work,generally speaking,is not successful,ie for Descartes,reduction is instable,phenomenality is incomplete and intentionality does not appear,although Descartes'contribution to phenomenology has indeed been depreciated before.