摘要
立足于高校英语专业综合英语课程构建写作多元评价体系的意义和成效,通过问卷调查和反思日志等方法搜集数据,从学生视角分析了对该体系的接受度和改进措施。分析结果显示,大部分学生对写作多元评价体系持肯定态度,认为该体系公正、客观、高效,能够提供多元读者视角,促进自主学习,提升自我效能;在多元评价体系中,学生最认可机器评价。同时,分析结果也显示出该体系在机器评价反馈效用、自我评价主观性和功利心等方面存在局限性;学生学习经历和写作水平对该体系的接受度无显著影响。建议在各年级综合英语课程构建写作多元评价体系,同时应在以评促学评价理念的指导下,利用不同评价类型的特点和优势,实现评价效果最大化。
Based on the significance and efficacy of establishing a multiple assessment system for English writing within the comprehensive English courses for English majors in universities,this paper collects data through methods such as questionnaire surveys and reflective journals in order to analyze the acceptance and improvement measures of the system from the students'perspective.The results show that most students have a positive attitude towards this system,believing it to be fair,objective and efficient,and recognizing its capability to offer multiple readers'perspectives,promote autonomous learning and enhance self-efficacy;within this multiple assessment system,the students most value machine-based assessment;however,there are limitations in the system concerning the feedback utility of machine assessment,as well as the subjectivity and utilitarian considerations of self-asseaament;the students'learning experiences and writing proficiency levels do not significantly influence their acceptance of the system.It suggests establishing a multiple writing assessment system for comprehensive English courses across all grade levels,and believes the unique characteristics and advantages of different assessment types can be leveraged to maximize effects under the guidance of an assessment philosophy that promotes learning through assessment.
作者
杨洪
潘崇堃
YANG Hong;PAN Chongkun(School of Humanities and Law,Beijing University of Chemical Technology,Beijing 100029,China)
出处
《沈阳大学学报(社会科学版)》
2023年第5期77-84,共8页
Journal of Shenyang University:Social Science
基金
教育部高等教育司产学合作协同育人项目(202002059035)。
关键词
学生视角
英语写作
多元评价
students'perspective
English writing
multiple assessment