期刊文献+

劣质钵苗气吸式剔除装置参数优化及试验验证

Parameter optimization and experimental verification of the air suction removal device for inferior bowl seedlings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 温室育苗穴盘中劣质钵苗的存在会影响后期种苗移栽成活率,在出厂前急需将这些劣质钵苗基质块剔除,现有机械式剔除往往存在基质颗粒散落遗漏现象,而气吸式剔除方式则可以很好地弥补这一缺陷。为深入研究基质气吸式剔除方案的可行性以及分析负压作用下管路设计与吸附效率之间的关系,该研究进行了相关参数的优化与试验验证。以单因素试验为基础,初步筛选得到管径26 mm、管距6 mm、管长2000 mm为优选值,以此为基础,以200孔穴盘钵苗为对象,分析管型、管径、管距和管长4种因素对基质剔净率的影响,并进行响应面分析。试验结果表明,除管长以外其余因素对基质的剔净率均有显著影响。各因素的较优组合为:方管、管径26 mm、管距3 mm和管长1000 mm,当负压22 kPa,基质剔净率为95%左右,相比优化之前平均提高2.94%。该研究可为温室育苗中劣质钵苗基质气力剔除装备的设计提供参考。 Inferior bowl seedlings have posed a great threat to the survival rate of later seedling transplantation in greenhouse hole tray seedling cultivation.It is urgent to remove the matrix blocks of these holes before leaving the factory.However,the existing mechanical removal often causes the particle scattering and omission.Air suction removal can be expected to effectively compensate for this defect.In this study,a series of experiments were conducted to optimize and then verify the structural parameters in the matrix air suction removal scheme.A systematic analysis was implemented to determine the relationship between pipeline design and adsorption efficiency under negative pressure.A single factor experiment was also carried out to preliminarily select the optimal values of pipe diameter(10,18,26,and 32 mm),pipe spacing(0,4,8,and 12 mm),and pipe length(1000,2000,3000,and 4000 mm).A optimal combination was obtained with the pipe diameter 26 mm,pipe spacing 6 mm,and pipe length 2000 mm.Further expansion was carried out with 200-hole potted seedlings as the research object(The seedling emergence rate of the entire tray was 92%,and the health rate was 86%).Four factors were performed on the substrate removal rate,including pipe type(round tube,flat tube,and square tube),pipe diameter(inner diameter of 23,26,and 29 mm),pipe spacing(2,6,and 10 mm),and pipe length(1000,2000,and 3000 mm).Response surface analysis was conducted as well.The experimental results show that all four factors posed an impact on the matrix removel rate.Firstly,the pipe spacing and the pip type shared the greatest impact on the matrix removel rate,and then the pipe diameter.Nevertheless,there was the little effect of pipe length on the cleaning.Reasonable scaling was carried out in the later experimental design.Secondly,the larger the pipe diameter was,the better performance was.It was also necessary to consider the limitation of hole space and the damage to adjacent hole healthy seedlings.The smaller the pipe spacing was,the greater the negative pressure capacity was,and the better the matrix removel rate was,but the suction cup phenomenon was more serious.There was the little impact of the pipe length on the overall suction,but it cannot be ignored.Finally,the optimal combination of various factors was achieved:a square tube,an inner diameter of 26 mm at the end of the straw,a distance of 3 mm from the end of the straw to the port on the hole,and a length of approximately 1000 mm.Consequently,95%matrix removal was achieved at the maximum negative pressure of 22 kPa,which is an average increase of 2.94%compared to before optimization.More efficient substrate removal was achieved under the same negative pressure.The better performance was gained than the mechanical removal equipment of low-quality bowl seedling substrate.This finding and also provide the data reference for the design and development of removal equipment with substrate negative pressure.
作者 王小琴 俞高红 刘霓红 童俊华 商凯源 WANG Xiaoqin;YU Gaohong;LIU Nihong;TONG Junhua;SHANG Kaiyuan(School of Mechanical Engineering,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,China;Guangdong Institute of Modern Agricultural Equipment,Guangzhou 510630,China;Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Transplanting Equipment and Technology,Hangzhou 310018,China)
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第16期36-43,共8页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD2000702) 浙江省“领雁研发攻关计划项目”(2022C02026)。
关键词 温室 移栽机 钵苗 负压式 基质剔除 响应面分析 greenhouse transplanter bowl seedlings negative pressure type matrix removal response surface analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献247

共引文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部