期刊文献+

GHS-DRG付费模式在肿瘤专科医院的实践与思考 被引量:2

Practice and Reflection on GHS-DRG Payment Model in Tumor Specialized Hospitals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析GHS-DRG付费模式下某肿瘤专科医院入组恶性增生性疾患的靶向、免疫治疗(RG1)组的数据,探讨该组权重的合理性以及国家谈判药的医保支付问题。方法对2021年11月至2022年3月入组到RG1组病例数据进行描述性分析。结果按DRG付费对比项目付费,RG1组5个月减收278.50万元;住院费用中主要为药品费,占比达73.8%。结论RG1组按照当前权重医疗机构减收较多,各DRG组权重应建立动态调整机制。支付方式改革,要充分考虑国家谈判药的影响,国家谈判药品应单独进行支付,确保国家谈判药品政策落地实施。 Objective:To analyze the targeted and immunotherapy(RG1)group data of malignant proliferative diseases enrolled in a certain tumor specialized hospital under the GHS-DRG payment model,explore the rationality of the weight of this group,and discuss the issue of medical insurance payment for national negotiated drugs.Method:A descriptive analysis was conducted on the data of cases enrolled in the RG1 group from November 2021 to March 2022.Result:According to the DRG payment comparison project,RG1 group received a 5-month reduction of 2.785 million yuan;The main cost of hospitalization is drug expenses,accounting for 73.8%.Conclusion:According to the current weight,medical institutions in RG1 group have significantly reduced their income,and dynamic adjustment mechanisms should be established for the weights of each DRG group.The reform of payment methods should fully consider the impact of national negotiated drugs,which should be paid separately to ensure the implementation of national negotiated drug policies.
作者 郑金坡 田羿 柳俊杰 马雷 孙维师 张琪 郭思柔 张少谦 ZHENG Jin-po;TIAN Yi;LIU Jun-jie;MA Lei;SUN Wei-shuai;ZHANG Qi;GUO Si-rou;ZHANG Shao-qian(Cancer Hospital,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300070,China)
出处 《现代医院管理》 2023年第5期73-75,共3页 Modern Hospital Management
基金 天津医科大学2020年度医院管理创新项目“医疗机构视角下DRG付费实施路径及管理策略研究”(2020YG11)。
关键词 DRG 国家谈判药 权重 区域点数法 总额预算 DRG national negotiation drug weight area point method total budget
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献55

  • 1文小焱,陈俐,潘惊萍,段占祺,曾昭宇,陈媛,王鹏.2015年-2018年四川省恶性肿瘤住院患者医疗费用分析[J].中国病案,2020(9):60-63. 被引量:8
  • 2余秀君,程永忠,陈小蓉,王业钊.日间病房诊疗模式的建立及管理[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(10):1881-1882. 被引量:37
  • 3FETTER B, SHIN Y, FREEMAN J L. Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups [J]. Medical care, 1980,18(2):5-6.
  • 4WYNN B O, SCOTT M. Evaluation of ahernative methods to establish DRG relative weights[R]. Santa Monica: Rand Cor-poration, 2008.
  • 5NATHANSON M. Comprehensive cost accounting systems give chains an edge[J]. Modern healthcare, 1984,14(3): 122-128.
  • 6TAN S S, RUTYEN F F H, VANINEVELD B M, et al. Com- paring methodologies for the cost estimation of hospital servic- es[J]. European journal of health economics, 2009,10(4):39 - 45.
  • 7TAN S S, ALEXANDER G, LISBETH S, et al. DRG systems in Europe: variations in cost aceounting systems among 12 countries[J]. European journal of health economics, 2014,24 (6): 1023 - 1028.
  • 8COTTERILL P J, BOBULA R C,CONNERTON R. Compari- sons of alternative relative weights for diagnosis-related groups[J]. Health care financing review, 1986,7(3): 37-51.
  • 9DOBSON A J, DAVANZO J, DOHERTY M T. A Study of Hospital Charge Setting Practices[M]. Falls Church: Lewin Group, 2005.
  • 10Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the con- gress: physician-owned specialty hospitals[M]. Washington DC.: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, 2006.

共引文献111

同被引文献35

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部