期刊文献+

智慧城市建设能提升创业水平吗?——基于双重差分模型的检验 被引量:8

Can the Construction of Smart Cities Improve the Level of Entrepreneurship:A Test Based on Difference-in-Difference Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文利用国家智慧城市试点政策的准自然实验,基于2003—2018年间293个地级市的面板数据,使用双重差分方法评估智慧城市建设对创业水平的影响,并使用交错型DID方法进行稳健性检验。研究结果表明:智慧城市建设使城市的创业水平提高8%左右,并且政策效果存在一定的滞后性和累积性;智慧城市建设通过改善城市的营商环境并提高投资水平,间接提升城市的创业水平;试点政策对不同城市的影响存在差异,人口密度大以及初始条件良好的城市受试点政策的影响更大;由于创业知识的空间溢出效应,智慧城市建设不仅能够提升当地创业水平,对周边城市的创业水平也存在显著的正向影响,并且距离越近的城市受试点政策影响越大。 This paper uses the quasi-natural experiment of the national smart city pilot policy,based on the panel data of 293 prefecture-level cities in China from 2003 to 2018,uses the difference-in-difference method to evaluate the impact of smart city construction on an entrepreneurial level,and uses the interlaced DID method to test the robustness.The results show that the construction of smart city increases the entrepreneurial level of the city by about 8%,and the effect of this policy has a certain lag and accumulation.The construction of a smart city can indirectly improve the entrepreneurial level of the city by improving the business environment and the level of investment.Different cities are affected by the pilot policy differently,and cities with a great population intensity and good initial conditions(in eastern China)are affected more by the pilot policy.Due to the spatial spillover effect of entrepreneurial knowledge,smart city construction not only improves the local entrepreneurial level,but also has a significant positive impact on the entrepreneurial level of the surrounding cities,and the closer the city is,the greater the impact of the pilot policy.
作者 周文义 陶一桃 Zhou Wenyi;Tao Yitao
出处 《统计研究》 北大核心 2023年第8期122-134,共13页 Statistical Research
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国经济特区发展史(1978—2018)”(16ZDA003) 深圳市社科基金项目“香港北部都会区规划背景下的深港融合发展研究”(SZ2022B041)。
关键词 智慧城市建设 创业水平 营商环境 投资水平 溢出效应 Smart City Construction Entrepreneurship Level Business Environment Investment Level SpilloverEffect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献132

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7615
  • 2张爽,陆铭,章元.社会资本的作用随市场化进程减弱还是加强?——来自中国农村贫困的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),2007,6(2):539-560. 被引量:299
  • 3罗党论,唐清泉.政府控制、银企关系与企业担保行为研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].金融研究,2007(03A):151-161. 被引量:60
  • 4La Porta, R. , F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, an,,t R. Vishny, 1998, " Law and Finance" , Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113-1155.
  • 5Levine, R. , 1999, " Law, Finance and Economic Growth" , Journal of Financial lntermediation 8 : 36-67.
  • 6Montgome, D. J., 1991, "Social Networks and Labor Market Outcomes: towards an Economic Analysis", American Economic Review 81 (5) : 1408-1418.
  • 7Munshi, K. and M. Rosenzweig, 2006, "Traditional Institutions Meet the Modern World: Caste, Gender, and Schooling Choice in a Globalizing Economy", American Economic Review 96 (4) : 1225-1252.
  • 8Munshi, K. and M. Rosenzweig, 2010, "Why is Mobility in India So Low? Social Insurance, Inequality and Growth", NBER Working Paper No. 14850.
  • 9Narayan, D. and L. Pritchett. , 1997," Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania". Policy Research Working Paper No. 1796, Washington DC: World Bank.
  • 10Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R. Nanetti. , 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

共引文献1764

同被引文献163

引证文献8

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部