期刊文献+

模拟核医学临床成像模体及其性能评价进展

Research advances in nuclear medicine imaging simulation with phantoms and itsperformance evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 核医学成像设备的质量控制是保障核医学成像质量和安全的必备工作,模体是核医学成像设备质量控制、性能比较、多中心临床试验等领域中不可缺少的工具。模体从结构单一向模拟临床真实条件发展,结合现代化技术提供不同的形式。不同种类模体具有独特的优势与适用情形。本文通过调研并综述核医学成像所用的常用模体及性能评价指标,为核医学设备质量控制及临床科研选用模体提供参考。 The quality control of nuclear medicine imaging equipment is essential to ensure the quality and safety of nuclear medicine imaging.Phantoms are indispensable tools in quality control,performance comparison,and multicenter clinical trials of nuclear medicine imaging equipment.The structure of phantoms is developed from a simple form to a complicated form which can simulate real clinical conditions,and they are provided in various forms in combination with modern technologies.Different types of phantoms have their unique advantages and application situations.This article investigated and summarizes common phantoms and their performance evaluation indicators used in nuclear medicine imaging to provide a reference for the quality control of nuclear medicine equipment and selection of phantoms for clinical research.
作者 苏雪松 耿建华 Su Xuesong;Geng Jianhua(Department of Nuclear Medicine,National Cancer Center,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100021,China)
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第7期564-571,共8页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
关键词 模体 核医学成像 模拟临床 性能 Phantom Nuclear medicine imaging Clinical simulation Performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献54

  • 1Huanjing Bi,Yan Jin.Current progress of skin tissue engineering:Seed cells, bioscaffolds, and construction strategies[J].Burns & Trauma,2013,1(2):63-72. 被引量:14
  • 2陈香,赵军,管一晖,薛方平,左传涛,华逢春.PET/CT图像采集时间对图像质量和病灶检出率的影响[J].中华核医学杂志,2007,27(1):43-45. 被引量:7
  • 3Kitagawa Y, Sadato N, Azuma H, et al. ^18F-FDC. PET to evaluate combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy of head and neck neoplasms[J]. J Nucl Med, 1999, 40(7): 1132-1137.
  • 4Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ. PET in assessment of therapy response in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and of the esgphagus[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(1): 56-68.
  • 5Huang SC. Anatomy of SUV[J]. Nucl Med Biol, 2000, 27(7): 643-646.
  • 6Visvikis D, Cheze-LeRest C, Costa DC, et al. Influence of OSEM and segmented attenuation correction in the calculation of standardized uptake values for[^18FDG PET[J]. Eur J Nucl Med, 2001, 28(9):1326-1335.
  • 7Ramos CD, Erdi YE, Gonen M, et al. FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection[J].Eur J Nucl Med, 2001, 28(2): 155-164.
  • 8Lerman H, Master U, Grisaru D, et al. Normal and abnormal ^18F-FDG endometrlal and ovarian uptake in pre- and postmenopausal vatients: assessment by PET/CT[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45 (2): 266-271.
  • 9Beaulieu S, Kinahan P, Tseng J, et al. SUV varies with time after injection in ^18F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences[J]. J Nucl Med, 2003, 44(7):1044-1050.
  • 10Yutani K, Tatsumi M, Eiichi S, et al. comparison of dual-head coincidence gamma camera FDG imaging with FDG PET in detecting of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis[J]. J Nucl Med,1999, 40(6): 1003-1008.

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部