制裁法对合同法律适用的影响及其应对--一个不同于传统的解释维度

A Study of the Impact and Responses of Sanction Law on Applicable Law of the Contract:A Whole New Dimension of Interpretation

为了免受制裁,企业往往会约定遵守制裁法,以满足合规要求。在后续的争议解决环节,裁判者务实地处理制裁法的法律适用问题,能够为交易安全注入确定性。然而,根据传统的“法律关系本座说”,国际私法属于民法的延伸,外国公法无法引入该领域,这意味着企业仍需面对“遵守制裁—违约风险”和“违反制裁—制裁风险”的两难困境。更恰当的做法是从冲突法革命后的“政府利益分析说”出发,对国际私法的公法化或社会化现象作合理解释。通过“政府利益分析说”重构国际私法,中国的公法规范也可进行域外适用,其中的反制裁法甚至能在域外产生阻断制裁法实施的效力。

In order to avoid sanctions,companies often agree to abide by sanctions law to meet compliance requirements.In the follow-up of dispute resolution,the judges and arbitrators pragmatically deal with the application of sanctions law,which can inject certainty to the safety of transactions.However,according to the traditional theory of the seat of legal relations,private international law belongs to the applicable law of civil law,and foreign public law cannot be introduced into this field.It is more appropriate to explain the socialization of private international law and the introduction of foreign public law from the perspective of governmental interest analysis after the revolution of conflict of laws.By reconstructing the private international law through the theory of government interest analysis,China’s public law can also be applied extraterritorially,and the anti-sanction law can even block the implementation of the sanction law.