期刊文献+

美国政府与中国台湾当局围绕1966年中国代表权问题的交涉 被引量:1

Negotiations over the 1966 Issue of Chinese Representation between the U.S.Government and the China Taiwan Authority
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1966年的第21届联合国大会,美国政府拟以“继承国”理论在联合国制造“两个中国”局面。但现实情况是,美国政府既无法劝说中国台湾当局接受有涉“两个中国”的方案,也无法使加拿大政府放弃涉及安理会席位的“一中一台”提案。为争取中国台湾当局接受美方在联合国中国代表权问题上的政策调整,同时也为降低加拿大提案的影响力,美国转而支持由意大利主张、实际是美方亲手设计的“研究委员会案”。由此,美台之间经历了一场步步为营的交涉博奔过程,而蒋介石在关键时刻的“压迫策略”,对美国在联合国推动“研究委员会案”起到了抑制作用。 In the 21st session of the United Nations General Assembly in 1966,the United States government intended to create a"two Chinas"situation in the United Nations on the basis of the"successor state"theory.However,the reality was that the U.S.government could neither persuade the China Taiwan authority to accept a proposal involving"two Chinas,"nor could it dissuade the Canadian government from withdrawing its proposal for"one China,one China Taiwan"involving a seat on the Security Council.In order to win the support of the China Taiwan authority for the U.S.policy adjustment on the issue of Chinese representation in the United Nations,and at the same time to reduce the influence of the Canadian proposal,the United States turned to support the"Study Committee Case"advocated by Italy,which was actually designed by the U.S.side.As a result,the United States and China Taiwan region went through a process of step-by-step negotiation and bargaining.Chiang Kai-shek's"oppression strategy"at a critical moment had a restraining effect on the United States'efforts to promote the"Study Committee Case"in the United Nations.
作者 丁志远 Ding Zhiyuan
出处 《台湾历史研究》 2023年第4期95-109,共15页 Taiwan History Studies
基金 国家社科基金项目"国民党当局‘一个中国立场’研究(1950一1971)"(编号22BZS144)阶段性成果。
关键词 中国台湾当局 中国代表权问题 美国政府 “研究委员会案” China Taiwan authority the issue of Chinese representation U.S.government "Study Committee Case"
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献65

  • 1顾宁.肯尼迪政府阻挠中国重返联合国始末[J].世界历史,1996(1):92-99. 被引量:6
  • 2[1]王正华主编.中华民国与联合国史料汇编·中国代表权[Z].台北:国史馆,2001.
  • 3[2][加]包义文、傅尧乐主编.新开端:加拿大与中华人民共和国(1949-1970)[M].郑州:河南人民出版社,1995.
  • 4[3]David S.Patterson,Harriet Dashiell Schwar.Foreign Relations of the United States,1964-1968[Z].Washington:United States Government Printing Office,1998.
  • 5[4]Historical Office Bureau of Public Affairs ed.American foreign policy,current documents,1966[Z].Washington:U.S.Government Printing office,1969.
  • 6[5]Lung-Chu Chen,Harold D.Lasswell.Formosa,China,and the United Nations--Formosa in the World Community[M].New York:St.Martin's Press,1967.
  • 7[6]新华社讯.严正抨击美国在联大搞"两个中国"阴谋,巴基斯坦等许多国家代表主张恢复中国合法权利,驱逐蒋帮[N].人民日报,1966-11-25(4).
  • 8中共中央文献研究室编.《周恩来年谱(1949—1976)》中卷[M].中央文献出版社,1997年.第166-167页.
  • 9James C. Thomson, Jr., On the Making of U. S. China Policy, 1961-9: A Study in Bureaucratic Politics, The China Quarterly, No. 50. (Apr. -Jun., 1972), pp. 220-243.
  • 10Robert Garson, Lyndon B. Johnson and the China Enigma, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 32, No. 1. (Jan., 1997), pp. 6380. etc.

同被引文献95

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部