期刊文献+

提取诱发遗忘的动态效应:提取与重学交叉混合练习的联合影响

The Dynamic Effects of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting:Combined Influence of Retrieval and Restudy Cross-Mixing Practices
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提取诱发遗忘(retrieval-induced forgetting,RIF)的提取特定性研究主要局限于单一情境,忽视了提取与重学交叉混合练习对RIF的影响。本研究采用提取练习范式变式,实验1通过单一与混合两种方式操作练习情境,旨在验证RIF的动态效应;实验2通过联合混合练习与再学两种操作,旨在借助RIF加速再学现象探讨混合情境中RIF的形成机制。结果显示:(1)仅提取练习在单一情境中可以产生RIF,RIF存在提取特定性;(2)重学练习在混合情境中可以产生RIF,重学练习表现出RIF动态效应;(3)再学可消除RIF,混合情境中产生了RIF加速再学现象。结果表明,重学练习在由单一情境转变为混合情境时会产生稳定的RIF动态效应,且这种RIF是由抑制机制引起的。 Retrieval specificity studies of retrieval-induced forgetting(RIF)have largely been limited to pure conditions,neglecting the effects of mixed practice of retrieval and restudy crossover on RIF.In this study,the adapted retrieval practice paradigm was used.Experiment 1 was designed to verify the dynamic effects of RIF by manipulating the practice condition in both pure and mixed ways.Experiment 2 was designed to explore the mechanism of RIF in mixed practice condition by means of the phenomenon of accelerated relearning after RIF through the operation of the combined mixed practice and relearning two manipulations.The results showed that:1)only retrieval practice exhibited RIF in pure condition,and there was retrieval specificity in RIF;2)restudy practice could exhibit RIF in mixed condition,and restudy practice showed RIF dynamic effects;3)relearning could eliminate RIF,and the phenomenon of accelerated relearning after RIF was exhibited in mixed condition.The results indicate that restudy practice exhibits stable dynamic effects of RIF when switching from the pure condition to mixed condition,and that RIF is caused by inhibitory mechanism.
作者 王卓 刘旭 蔡佳 陈芷柔 WANG Zhuo;LIU Xu;CAI Jia;CHEN Zhirou(School of Education,Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan 411201;Laboratory for Traumatic Stress Studies,CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health,Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 北大核心 2023年第5期585-591,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 全国教育科学规划国家一般课题(BBA210037)。
关键词 提取诱发遗忘 抑制理论 切换代价 动态效应 RIF 加速再学现象 retrieval-induced forgetting inhibitory theory switch cost dynamic effects accelerated relearning after RIF.
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献120

  • 1彭聃龄.汉语信息加工及其认知神经机制的研究——20年研究工作的回顾[J].当代语言学,2004,6(4):302-320. 被引量:37
  • 2Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 2003, 7(3) :134 - 140.
  • 3Rogers R D, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of experimental psychology: General. 1995, 124(2) :207- 231.
  • 4Meiran N, Chorev Z & Sapir A. Compoment Processes in Task Switching. Cognitive Psychology. 2000,41:211 - 253.
  • 5Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition. 1996,22(6) : 1423- 1442.
  • 6Monsell, S., Mizon, G. A: Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 2006, 32(3): 493-516.
  • 7Altmann E M. The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 2004, 32 ( 1 ) : 153- 163.
  • 8Allport, A., Wylie, G. Task switching, stimulusresponse bindings and negative priming. In S. Monsell, J. Driver; (Eds.): Attention and Performance X Ⅷ :Control of Cognitive Processes , MIT Press. 2000. 35 - 70.
  • 9Mayr U, & Kliegl R. Task - set switching and long - term memory retrieval. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2000,26(5) : 1124 - 1140.
  • 10Hsieh S. Two- component processes in switching attention: a study of event - related potentials. Perceptual and motor skills, 2002,94:1168 -1176.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部