期刊文献+

基于CIPP的英语类专业写作课程评价体系研究 被引量:2

A Study on Evaluation System of Writing Courses for English Majors Based on CIPP Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着国家推进课程“教学评一体化”政策的实施,应用CIPP课程评价理论,通过权威评估文件、课程特点及专家问卷访谈构建英语类专业写作课程评价指标体系具有一定的可行性,并且通过采用SPSS统计软件对问卷数据进行指标体系的一致性检验、信度和效度检验,可以验证评价指标的合理性。研究结果显示:专家关于指标体系的评判具有较高的一致性,表明该课程指标体系的构建具有一定的合理性,英语类专业写作课程评价指标体系的4个一级指标、14个二级指标、27个三级指标均达到信度和效度的要求,能为英语类专业写作课程实施课程评估提供参考和借鉴。 With the national policy of promoting the Integration of Teaching,Learning and Evaluation,this study,based on the CIPP curriculum evaluation theory,constructs an evaluation index system for English writing courses through referring to the authoritative evaluation documents,curriculum characteristics and expert questionnaire interviews.And Spss statistical software are used to test the consistency,reliability and validity of the index system of the questionnaire data,so as to verify the rationality of the evaluation index.The results show that:the experts’opinions on the indicators show high consistency,indicating that the indicators are accurate and reasonable.Besides,the four first-level indicators,14 second-level indicators and 27 third-level indicators of the evaluation index system of English writing courses all meet the requirements of reliability and validity,which can provide reference for the implementation of curriculum evaluation of English writing courses.
作者 李燕 孙金凤 LI Yan;SUN Jinfeng(Shanxi Technology and Business University,Taiyuan,Shanxi,030036)
机构地区 山西工商学院
出处 《山西广播电视大学学报》 2023年第3期14-17,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Radio & TV University
基金 山西省教育科学“十四五”规划2022年度课题(一般规划课题)“教学评一体化背景下基于CIPP模式的英语类专业写作课程评价体系构建研究”(GH-220529)。
关键词 CIPP 英语类专业写作课程 评价指标体系 CIPP Writing courses for English major Evaluation index system
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献91

  • 1周梅.项目驱动下理工科博士生英语学术交流能力的培养——一项基于“国际学术交流英语”课程的实证研究[J].中国ESP研究,2019,0(2):100-110. 被引量:4
  • 2戴炜栋,刘春燕.学习理论的新发展与外语教学模式的嬗变[J].外国语,2004,27(4):10-17. 被引量:322
  • 3王初明,牛瑞英,郑小湘.以写促学——一项英语写作教学改革的试验[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(3):207-212. 被引量:959
  • 4Admiraal W, Hoeksma M, van de Kamp M T & van Duin G. Assessment of teacher competence using video portfolios: Reliability, construct validity, and consequential validity [ J ]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2011,27(6) : 1019-1028.
  • 5Baume D & Yorke M. The reliability of assessment by portfolio on a course to develop and accredit teachers in higher education [ J ]. Studies in Higher Education, 2002,27 ( 1 ) : 7-25.
  • 6Baume D, Yorke M & Coffey M. What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment? [ J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2004,29(4) : 451-477.
  • 7Berryman L & Russell D R. Portfolios across the curriculum: Whole school assessment in Kentucky [ J ]. The English Journal, 2001, 90(6) : 76-83.
  • 8Bird F L & Yueel R. Improving marking reliability of seientifie writing with the developing understanding of as- sessment for learning programme[ J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2013,38 (5) :536-553.
  • 9Bloxham S. Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources[J]. Assessment & E- valuation in Higher Education, 2009, 34(2) : 209-220.
  • 10Brennan R L. An essay on the history and future of reliability from the perspective of replications [ J ]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2001,38(4) :295-317.

共引文献59

同被引文献20

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部