期刊文献+

单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤旋切隔离保护技术的应用

Application of single-port laparoscopic hysteromyoma excision and isolation protection technology
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较袋内一体化电动旋切与袋内手动冷刀旋切在经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用效果。方法:回顾性分析2021年7月至2023年6月期间在武汉大学中南医院妇科行经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术患者的病历信息,包括袋内一体化电动旋切组52例,袋内手动冷刀旋切组61例。分析比较两组患者住院时长、手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血率、术后并发症发生率、术后24 h视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)疼痛评分、取物袋破损率、术后引流管拔除时间、术后尿管拔除时间、术后肠道通气时间、术前与术后(1 d和3 d)血红蛋白差值及术后病理。结果:与袋内手动冷刀旋切组相比,袋内一体化电动旋切组手术时间更短[(152.88±43.37)min vs. (176.23±59.45)min,P=0.021]、取物袋破损率更低[0(0.0%) vs. 8(13.1%),P=0.019]差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。住院时长、术中出血量、术中输血率、术后并发症发生率、术后24 h VAS疼痛评分、术后引流管拔除时间、术后尿管拔除时间、术后肠道通气时间、术前与术后(1 d和3 d)血红蛋白差值及术后病理,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中,袋内一体化电动旋切是一种安全可行的方案,可与单孔腹腔镜及电动旋切器配套使用,与袋内手动冷刀旋切相比手术时长更短、取物袋破损率更低,但仍需大样本前瞻性研究进一步验证。 ObjectiveTo compare the application of in-bag integrated power morcellation and contained manual scalpel morcellation in transumbilical single-port laparoscopic myomectomy.MethodsThe medical records of patients who underwent transumbilical single-port laparoscopic myomectomy at the Department of Gynecology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from Jul. 2021 to Jun. 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 52 patients who underwent in-bag integrated power morcellation and 61 patients who underwent contained manual scalpel morcellation. Compare and analyze the hospitalization time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, postoperative complications, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of 24 h after surgery, the rate of bag breakage, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative urinary catheter removal time, postoperative intestinal ventilation time, hemoglobin difference between preoperative and postoperative (1 d and 3 d) and postoperative pathology.ResultsCompared with the contained manual scalpel morcellation group, the in-bag integrated power morcellation group had shorter operation time [(152.88±43.37)min vs. (176.23±59.45)min, P=0.021] and lower rate of bag breakage [0 (0.0%) vs. 8 (13.1%), P=0.019]. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared the in-bag integrated power morcellation group with the contained manual scalpel morcellation group, there was no significantly statistical difference (P>0.05) in the hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, postoperative complications rate, VAS pain score of 24 h after surgery, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative catheter removal time, postoperative intestinal ventilation time, hemoglobin difference between preoperative and postoperative (1 d and 3 d), and postoperative pathology.ConclusionIn transumbilical single-port laparoscopic myomectomy, in-bag integrated power morcellation is a safe and feasible solution. It can be used with single-port laparoscope and electric rotator. Compared with contained manual scalpel morcellation, in-bag integrated power morcellation has shorter operation time and lower bag breakage rate, but it still needs further verification in large-sample prospective studies.
作者 罗曼文 黄桔园 刘艳燕 易跃雄 陈雨柔 熊家强 王景涛 张蔚 Manwen Luo;Juyuan Huang;Yanyan Liu;Yuexiong Yi;Yurou Chen;Jiaqiang Xiong;Jingtao Wang;Wei Zhang(Department of Gynecology,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Hubei 430071,China)
出处 《中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版)》 2023年第4期220-226,共7页 Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition)
基金 湖北省科技计划重大科技专项(2023BCA002) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2042022kf1157)。
关键词 子宫肌瘤剔除术 袋内粉碎 电动旋切 经脐单孔腹腔镜 妇科 Myomectomy In-bag morcellation Power morcellation Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery Gynecology
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献59

  • 1Abe N, Mori T, Takeuchi H, et al. Successful treatment of early stage gastric cancer by laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection with lymphadenectomy [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2008,68 (6) : 1220-1224.
  • 2Wallach EE, Vlahos NF. Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004,104(2) :393-406.
  • 3Nevadunsky NS, Bachmann GA, Nosher J, et al. Women'sdecision-making determinants in choosing uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids [J ] J Reprod Med, 2001, 46(10) : 870-874.
  • 4Lippman SA, Warner M, Samuels S, et al. Uterine fibroids and gynecologic pain symptoms in a population-based study EJ]. Fertil Steril, 2003,80(6) : 1488-1494.
  • 5Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence [J]. Fertil Steril, 2009,91 (4) : 1215-1223.
  • 6Stovall DW. Clinical symptomatology of uterine leiomyomas [J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2001,44 ( 2 ) : 364-371.
  • 7Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, et al. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility [J]. Gyneeol Endocrinol, 2006,22(2): 106-109.
  • 8Gobern JM, Rosemeyer C, Barter JF, et al. Comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy in a community hospital [ J] .SLS, 2013,17 ( 1 ) : 116.
  • 9Mansour FW, Kives S, Urbach DR, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopie myomectomy: a Canadian experience [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2012,34(4) : 353-358.
  • 10Mattei A, Cioni R, Bargelli G, et al. Techniques of laparoscopic mynmeetomy [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2011,23 ( 1 ) : 34-39.

共引文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部