期刊文献+

促进科学本质理解的多元教学路径——科学本质教学的国际视角与启示 被引量:2

Multiple Teaching Routes to Promote the Understanding of the Nature of Science:The International Perspective and Enlightenment of the Nature of Science Teaching
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为科学素养的核心,科学本质理解需要显性教学。立足本土化的科学本质教学实践探索,提出了促进科学本质理解的多元教学路径,即科学探究教学、融入科学史哲的教学、科学论证教学、基于社会性科学议题的教学以及科学阅读与科学写作等。进而提出科学本质教学要走向综合、开放、多元,具体表现为:厘清科学本质的内涵与定位,使科学本质教学目标显性化;挖掘不同教学方法的教育价值,丰富和创新科学本质教学方法;发展教师关于科学本质的学科教学知识,探索促进科学本质理解的新路径;基于科学学科知识,建构科学本质的教学评价体系。 Understanding the nature of science(NOS)is the core of scientific literacy,it requires explicit teaching.Based on the text analysis of the international NOS empirical research,the multipule teaching routes of NOS were put forward.Namely,scientific inquiry teaching,history and philosophy of science teaching,scientific argumentation,scientific reading and writing,integrating socioscientific issues,etc.Further,we put forward four points of views which are clarifying the connotation,orietntation and goal of NOS,excavate the educational value of different teaching methods and innovate the diversified NOS teaching,to develop teachers’PCK of NOS and explore a new way of NOS teaching,constructing the evaluation system of NOS teaching combining with science subject knowledge.
作者 黄晓 HUANG Xiao(Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004)
出处 《教育科学研究》 北大核心 2023年第9期52-59,共8页 Educational Science Research
基金 2021年度全国教育科学规划国家一般课题“高质量教育视域下科学本质理解转化的实证研究”(BHA210121)的成果之一。
关键词 科学本质 科学探究 科学史哲 科学论证 社会性科学议题 the nature of science scientific inquiry history and philosophy of science scientific argumentation socioscientific issues
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献63

  • 1子叶.迪尔沃恩:科学定律与理论[J].哲学动态,1988(3):24-24. 被引量:2
  • 2辛继湘.让探究教学神形兼备[J].中国教育学刊,2005(1):34-37. 被引量:29
  • 3李平,李大超.基于模型推理的科学认知论题[J].哲学研究,2005(10):65-72. 被引量:5
  • 4张盛彬.推理链:科学发现的逻辑新论[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,32(6):40-44. 被引量:1
  • 5Padilla, M. J., Okey, J. R., & Gerrard, K. (1984), The effects of instruction on integrated science process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 277-287.
  • 6Keys, C. W. (1994). The development ofseientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: An interpretive study of six Journal of Research in Science Education, ninth-grade students 31(9), 1003-1022.
  • 7Entwistle, N. J. (1985). Cognitive style and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 2). New York: Pergamon Press.
  • 8[美]L·W·安德森等著.皮连升译.学习、教学和评估的分类学-布卢姆教育目标分类学修订版[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.2008(1):39.
  • 9Sternberg, R. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Langer, J.A. & Applebee, A.. How Writing Shapes Thinking: a Study of Teaching and Learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

共引文献209

同被引文献4

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部