未成年人附条件不起诉制度的理论分歧与弥合

Theoretical Differences and Bridging of Conditional Non-prosecution System for Minors

未成年人附条件不起诉制度拥趸者把特殊情况区别对待的原则、起诉便宜主义以及刑罚预防功能论作为立论基础。主张限制未成年人附条件不起诉制度者则把一视同仁对待原则、起诉严厉主义以及刑罚报复功能论作为反对基础。最大限度实现社会公平与正义与“法与时变”法律认识论为弥合分歧提供了理论依据,犯罪数量的增长及犯罪结构轻刑化为弥合分歧提供了现实基础。理论分歧的弥合应围绕罪名边界不清、悔罪表现难界定、附加条件设置不合理、考察与帮教机制缺失等问题展开。

The supporters of the conditional non-prosecution system for minors take the principle of distinguishing special cases,the doctrine of free evaluation prosecution and the theory of penalty prevention function as the foundation of their arguments.On the other hand,those who advocate conditional non-prosecution system for minors regard the principle of equal treatment,prosecution sternism and the theory of the function of punishment retaliation as the basis of opposition.The principle of maximized realization of social justice and the legal epistemology of"law develops with times"provide the theoretical basis for bridging the differences,and the increase of crime quantity and the mitigated punishment of crime provide the realistic basis.The bridging of theoretical differences should focus on such problems as unclear boundary of accusation,difficult definition of repentance,unreasonable additional conditions,and lack of investigation and teaching mechanism.