期刊文献+

我国传统语文读写结合演变与反思 被引量:2

Combination of Reading and Writing in Traditional Chinese Language Education:Evolution and Reflections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 读写结合作为我国传统语文教育思想的重要组成部分,二者之间的关系经历了系列演变过程:从古代阅读与写作各自独立分步进行,到近代以读促写,发展到当代二者关系的多元化。反思读写结合的实践现状,其存在结合点狭窄僵化、结合序列不合理等问题。在新的教育理念和语文课程发展背景下,读写结合需要拓展多元结合,合理定位仿写,丰富读写结合文本类型,在传承传统经验的基础上改进创新,以期提升读写结合的教学质量。 The combination of reading and writing is an important component in the traditional pedagogy of Chinese Language education.The relationship between reading and writing has gone through several stages:from the ancient separation of reading and writing in pedagogy,both of which followed a step⁃by⁃step procedure,to facilitating writing with reading in modern times,and then to the diversified relationship of the two in the contemporary times.Reflecting on the current situation of the practice of the combination of reading and writing,this study finds some problems,such as the narrow and rigid binding points and the unreasonable combination sequence.Under the background of the new educational philosophy and the development of the Chinese language curriculum,there is a need for diversified patterns of the combination of reading and writing,appropriate orientation of mimetic writing,enlargement of the text types for the combination of reading and writing.Improvement and innovation should be made on the basis of inheriting traditional experience to improve the teaching quality of reading and writing in the combination.
作者 李丽华 LI Lihua(School of Humanities,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 500016,China)
出处 《河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第6期126-130,共5页 Journal of Hebei Normal University(Educational Science)
基金 教育部重大攻关项目“中华传统优秀文化在语文教材中的传承研究与数据库建设”(20JZD049) 广州市高等教育教学质量与教学改革工程教学团队项目“语文教师教育类课程群教学”(2022JXTD008)。
关键词 语文教学 读写结合 学习方法 Chinese language teaching combination of reading and writing learning method
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1李海林.语言能力的心理模型及教学策略[J].中学语文教学参考(教师版),2004(8):13-15. 被引量:10
  • 2王蔷.2006.英语教学法教程(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
  • 3健林,朱晓斌.写作心理学[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,2003.169,172,177-181.
  • 4Weaver C. Understanding Whole language: from Principle to Practice [M]. Portsmouth. NH.. Heinemann, 1986. 9, 39--40.
  • 5Nelson N. , Calfee R C. The Reading writing Connection Viewed Historically EA-. Nelson N, Calfee R C. (Eds.). Ninety-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education [C]. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, Par II. 1998. 1--55.
  • 6Tieney R J. , Shanahan T. Research on the Reading writing Relationship: Interactions, Transactions, and Outcomes [ A]. Barr R, Kamil M L, Mosenthal P, Pearson P D. (Eds.). The Handbook of Reading Research[C]. New York: Longman, 1991, Vol. 2. 246--280.
  • 7Goodman K S. Reading, Writing and Written Texts: A Transactional Sociopsycholinguistic View [A]. Ruddell R. Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading [C]. Newark, DE:International Reading Association, 1994. 1093--1130.
  • 8Blanton L L. A Holistic Approach to College ESL.. Integrating Language and Content [J].ELT Journal, 1992, 46 (3): 1--24.
  • 9Schlumberger A L. The Effects of Elaboration on Community College Students' Execution of a Reading-writing Task [D]. The University of Arizona, 1991. 1--24.
  • 10Mermelstein L. Reading/Writing Connections in the K-12 Classroom: Find the Clarity and then Blur the Lines [M]. Pearson Education, 2006, Inc. i-- iii, 1.

共引文献67

同被引文献1

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部