期刊文献+

临床医学科研报告的撰写 被引量:1

Drafting reports of clinical studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 临床科研报告作为科研成果的最终呈现方式,直接反映了研究质量的高低。本文介绍了不同临床科研报告的撰写,如观察性研究和随机对照试验研究,对于随机对照试验进行了重点阐述,并对所涉及的设计类型辅以实例进行概述。每种科研设计都有其报告重点,科研论文的撰写都有统一的要求和特定的撰写格式,掌握科研报告的正确撰写格式对于进行高质量临床医学研究具有实际价值和重要意义。 Clinical research reports serve as the presentation of scientific research findings and directly reflect the quality of the research.This article describes the writing of different types of clinical research reports,such as observational studies and randomized controlled trial studies,with a particular focus on randomized controlled trials.Each scientific research design has its reporting focus,and the writing of scientific research papers has uniform requirements and a specific writing format.Mastering the proper format of drafting research reports is of practical value and significant importance for conduction high-quality clinical research.
作者 杨之雨 曾慧娴 王瑞华 陈宏森 沈佳莹 谭晓㛃 张宏伟 曹广文 YANG Zhiyu;ZENG Huixian;WANG Ruihua;CHEN Hongsen;SHEN Jiaying;TAN Xiaojie;ZHANG Hongwei;CAO Guangwen(Department of Epidemiology,School of Basic Medical Science,Jinan University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510632,China;Department of Epidemiology,Naval Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China;Tongji University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200092,China)
出处 《上海预防医学》 CAS 2023年第9期941-947,共7页 Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 上海市公共卫生三年行动计划(GWV-10.1-XK17)。
关键词 临床研究 科研设计 STROBE CONSORT 随机对照试验 clinical study research design STROBE CONSORT RCT
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献41

  • 1杨丽然,邱仁宗.世界医学会《赫尔辛基宣言》——涉及人类受试者的医学研究的伦理原则[J].医学与哲学(A),2009(5):74-75. 被引量:53
  • 2吴泰相,李幼平,卞兆祥,李廷谦,李静,Simon Dagenais,David Moher,无.中医药临床随机对照试验报告规范(征求意见稿)[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(8):601-605. 被引量:124
  • 3Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of effects in controlled trials[J]. JAMA, 1995; 273(5):408-412
  • 4Torgerson DJ, Roberts C. Understanding controlled trials: randomization methods: concealment[J]. BMJ, 1999; 319(7 206):375-356
  • 5Schulz, Kenneth F. Subverting randomization in controlled trials[J]. JAMA, 1995; 274(18):1 456-1 458
  • 6Altman DG, Schulz KF. Statistics Notes: Concealing treatment allocation in randomized trials[J]. BMJ, 2001; 323(7 310):446-447
  • 7Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, Altman DG. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals[J]. JAMA, 1994; 272(2):125-128
  • 8Jadad AR. Randomised controlled trials, A user's guide.[2007-01-26]http://www.cgmh.org.tw/intr/intr5/c6700/OBGYN/F/Randomized%20tial/chapter I .html.
  • 9Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, et al. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med, 1983, 309:1359-1361.
  • 10Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias:dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA, 1995, 273: 408-412.

共引文献247

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部