期刊文献+

基于微扰理论与抽样方法的临界实验数据不确定度分析研究

Uncertainty Analysis of Critical Experimental Data Based on Perturbation Theory and Sampling Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基准化临界实验数据可为核数据的宏观检验、新型核能系统的设计方法验证以及核临界安全分析等提供基础数据支撑,不确定度分析是临界实验数据基准化评价中至关重要的一环。针对传统的基于测量不确定度表述导则(GUM)不确定度分析流程的“一次一变策略”进行临界实验数据不确定度分析方法存在的缺陷与不足,提出了基于微扰理论与抽样方法的不确定度分析方法。利用研制的拉丁超立方抽样程序及复杂建模程序对中子毒物效应净堆芯临界实验数据基准化的不确定度进行计算分析,大幅提高了不确定度分析的效率及其准确性。本文结果为后续批量临界实验数据的基准化以及多参数的不确定度分析提供了更加高效合理的分析手段。 The benchmarking critical experimental data can be used as a reference,providing basic data support for the macroscopic test of nuclear data,the design method verification of new nuclear energy system and the nuclear critical safety analysis,etc.As a crucial link in the process of benchmarking critical experimental data,the uncertainty analysis and evaluation of critical experimental data have been widely concerned and studied at home and abroad.Traditional GUM(Guide to the Uncertainty in Measurement)department based on the uncertainty analysis of the process“one change strategy at a time”uncertainty analysis method in calculation efficiency is low,cannot consider interval probability distribution characteristics of the input parameter error,defects of inaccurate results.In this paper,an uncertainty analysis method for critical experimental data was proposed based on perturbation theory and combination sampling method,and the probability distribution characteristics of input parameters in its error interval were restored by efficient Latin hypercube sampling method,so as to improve the accuracy and rationality of the uncertainty analysis of critical experimental data.By means of conjugate flux perturbation theory,the efficiency of critical experimental data uncertainty analysis was improved without significantly increasing the calculation time.Moreover,the efficient Latin hypercube sampling method and the conjugate flux perturbation method were verified and the feasibility of their application to the uncertainty analysis of critical experimental data was proved.Then,the Latin hypercube sampling program and complex modeling program were compiled,and the compiled program was verified and analyzed on the international critical safety benchmark question,and the calculation results obtained by the traditional critical experimental data uncertainty analysis method and the results given on the international critical safety benchmark question were compared.The conjugate flux perturbation uncertainty analysis method based on MCM(Monte Carlo method)analysis process improves the computational efficiency,makes the analysis results more reasonable and accurate,and proves that the uncertainty program is accurate and feasible for the uncertainty analysis of critical experimental data.Finally,the program was applied to the uncertainty analysis of critical experimental data of neutron toxicological effects in uranium solution obtained by China Institute of Atomic Energy,and a good result was obtained.Compared with the traditional critical experimental data uncertainty analysis method,the standard uncertainty of core characteristic value k eff is improved,and the efficiency of uncertainty analysis is greatly improved.The uncertainty analysis method of critical experimental data studied in this paper and the program of uncertainty analysis can provide a more efficient and reasonable analysis method for benchmarking uncertainty analysis and multi-parameter sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of subsequent batches of critical experimental data.
作者 张振洋 陈晓亮 夏兆东 宁通 周琦 ZHANG Zhenyang;CHEN Xiaoliang;XIA Zhaodong;NING Tong;ZHOU Qi(Reactor Engineering Technology Institute,China Institute of Atomic Energy,Beijing 102413,China)
出处 《原子能科学技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第11期2192-2200,共9页 Atomic Energy Science and Technology
关键词 微扰理论 临界实验数据基准化 不确定度分析 拉丁超立方抽样 perturbation theory benchmarking of critical experimental data uncertainty analysis Latin hypercube sampling
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1IVANOV K, AVRAMOVA M, KAMEROW S, et al. Benchmarks for uncertainty analysis in modelling (UAM) for the design, operation and safety analysis of LWRs, Vol I : Specification and support data for neutronics cases (Phase I ), Version 2.1 (final specifications)[R]. [S. 1. ] : OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2013.
  • 2WE1SBIN C R, MARABLE J H, LUCIUS J L,et al. Application of FORSS sensitivity and un- certainty methodology to fast reactor benchmark analysis[R]. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1976.
  • 3PUSA M. Incorporating sensitivity and uncer- tainty analysis to a lattice physics code with ap- plication to CASMO-4 [J].Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2012, 40(1): 153-162.
  • 4REARDEN B T, HOPPER C M, ELAM K R, et al. Applications of the TSUNAMI sensitivity and uncertainty analysis methodology[C]// ICNC2003. Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2003.
  • 5TAMAGNO P, Van ROOIJEN W F G, TAKE- DA T, et al. Sensitivity analysis of Mon)u using ERANOS with JENDL-4. 0 [C] // PHYSOR 2012. Knoxville, Tennessee, USA: American Nuclear Society, 2012.
  • 6KODELI I. Multidimensional deterministic nu- clear data sensitivity and uncertainty code sys- tem: Method and application[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2001, 138(1): 45-66.
  • 7刚直,周培德.由截面不确定度引起积分参数keff不确定度一维分析程序开发[C]//第十二届反应堆数值计算与粒子输运学术会议.合肥:中国核学会,2008.
  • 8陈其昌.任意几何特征线方法及其在直接循环堆组件计算中的应用研究[D].西安:西安交通大学,2010.
  • 9WILLIAMS M L, BROADHEAD B L, PARKS C V. Eigenvalue sensitivity theory for resonance- shielded cross sections[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2001, 138(2) : 177-191.
  • 10BALL M R. Uncertainty analysis in lattice reac- tor physics calculations [D]. McMaster: Mc- Master University, 2012.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部