期刊文献+

道德图灵测试能证明机器人具有道德吗 被引量:1

Can the moral Turing test prove that robots have morality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从本体论层面研究“机器人能否具有道德”,是一条无法开展的进路。道德图灵测试试图绕过理论上的分歧,提出判定机器人是否具有道德的标准。在介绍道德图灵测试的基础上,尝试对其测试目标和测试问题进行探讨。通过对道德的可测量性、机器人能否“理解”、测试标准与形式有效性的探讨,分析道德图灵测试是否能证明“机器人具有道德”。结果表明,道德图灵测试只能证明机器人有限意义上的道德。 Researching“can robots have morality”from an ontological perspective is an approach that cannot be carried out.The moral Turing test attempts to bypass the theoretical contradictions and propose criteria for determining whether a robot has morality.Based on an introduction to the moral Turing test,this paper attempts to explore its testing goals and testing issues.By exploring the measurability of morality,the ability for the machine to“understand”,and the validity of testing standard and testing form,it analyzes whether the moral Turing test can prove that“robots have morality”.The conclusion indicates that the moral Turing test can only prove that“robots have morality limitedly”.
作者 王丙吉 WANG Bingji(Department of philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《江苏理工学院学报》 2023年第5期17-24,共8页 Journal of Jiangsu University of Technology
基金 国家社科基金重点项目“智能哲学视域下的归纳逻辑前沿问题研究”(23AZX018)。
关键词 图灵测试 道德图灵测试 机器人伦理 机器人道德 the Turing test the moral Turing test robots ethics robot morality
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1[美]唐·伊德.技术与生活世界:从伊甸园到尘世[M].韩连庆,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012:32.
  • 2Mark Cocckelbergh. The Moral Standing of Machines: To- wards a Relational and Non-Cartesian Moral Hermeneutics [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2014, 27(1):61-77.
  • 3Luciano Flofidij.W.Sanders. On the Morality of Artificial A- gents [J]. Minds and Machines, 2004, 14(3):349-379.
  • 4John P.Sullins. When Is a Robot a Moral Agent? [J].Interna- tional Review of Information Ethics, 2006, 6(6):23-30.
  • 5Kenneth Einar Himma. Artificial Agency, Consciousness, and the Criteria for Moral Agency: What Properties Must an Arti- ficial Agent Have to Be a Moral Agent? [j]. Ethics and Infor- mation Technology, 2009, 11(1):19-29.
  • 6Steve Torrance. Artificial Consciousness and Artificial Ethics: Between Realism and Social Relatianism [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2014, 27(1):9-29.
  • 7Robert Sparrow. The March of the Robot Dogs [J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2002, 4(4):305-318.
  • 8Mark Coeckelbergh. Robot Bights?Towards a Social-Relation- al Justification of Moral Consideration [J]. Ethics and Infor- mation Technology, 2010, 12(3):209-221.
  • 9Mark Cocckelbergh. Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phe- nomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations[J]. Inter- national Journal of Social Robotics, 2011, 3(2):197-204.
  • 10Amanda Sharkey. Robots and Human Dignity: A Considera- tion of the Effects of Robot Care on the Dignity of Older Peo- ple [J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2014, 16 (1):637-675.

共引文献36

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部