期刊文献+

考虑二次防御设计的钢框架抗连续倒塌研究

Research on progressive collapse resistance of steel frame considering secondary defense design
原文传递
导出
摘要 各种偶然荷载作用可能引起结构局部破坏,甚至导致结构连续倒塌。采用二次防御设计理念,改善钢框架结构的抗连续倒塌性能,提出在梁柱节点区域设置弯起钢筋形成新的替代路径,并对梁-柱子结构进行Pushdown加载试验和数值模拟研究,分析钢筋直径、弯起高度和钢筋长度对子结构的作用,对比各子结构的荷载-位移曲线、破坏模式、变形能力,以及悬链线效应发展程度。研究结果表明:钢筋使子结构变形发展均匀,左右两侧梁对称变形,容易形成二力拉杆的效果,提高承载力和延性的同时,不改变塑性铰外移等构造特性;钢筋在弹性阶段基本没有参与钢梁的弯曲效应,随着加载位移增大,钢筋由弯折状态逐渐被拉直参与子结构的受力和变形,较大提高了悬链线抗力提供的内能,使悬链线贡献系数提高了20%左右;子结构的承载力随钢筋弯起高度和钢筋长度的变化趋势为先增大后减小,破坏模式也随之改变,根据钢筋和钢梁破坏顺序将子结构分为钢筋首先发生断裂、随后钢梁开裂和钢梁首先开裂、随后钢筋断裂两种破坏模式;弯起高度接近30 mm使钢筋充分发挥拉结作用,钢筋直径为12 mm易与常用弯起高度匹配,并避免损伤导致结构承载力大幅减小。 Various accidental loads may cause local damage to the structure and even lead to progressive collapse.Using the concept of secondary defense to improve the progressive collapse resistance of steel frame structure,a novel principle was proposed.The new concept involves installation of kinked reinforced bars in the beam-column joint area to realize alternative path.Pushdown loading test and numerical simulation were carried out on beam-column frame substructure with the kinked reinforced bars,taking into account the diameter,kinked height and length of the reinforced bars.The load-displacement curve,failure mode,deformation capacity and catenary development of the specimens were compared.The results show that the reinforced bars result in even deformation of the substructure,and encourage symmetrical deformation of the left and right beams to facilitate two-force tie rods,a case which improve the bearing capacity and ductility without changing the plastic hinge movement and other structural characteristics.The reinforced bars participate little in the bending action of the steel beam in the elastic state.With the increase of displacement,the reinforced bars gradually change from the bending state to the straightening state and participate in the stress and deformation of the specimen,which greatly improves the internal energy provided by the catenery resistance and increases the catenary contribution coefficient by about 20%.It is also found that the ultimate bearing capacity of the specimen increases and then decreases with the increase of kinked height and length of the reinforced bars,and the failure mode also changes accordingly.According to the sequence of reinforced bar fracture and steel beam cracking,the substructure is divided into two failure modes:steel bars first fracture,followed by steel beam cracking,and steel beam first cracking,followed by steel bars fracture.When the kinked height is close to 30 mm,the reinforced bars can play a better role in its tensile function and the diameter d=12 mm can better match the commonly used kinked height,and avoid reduction in the bearing capacity of the specimens caused by damage.
作者 乔惠云 许皓晖 陈誉 魏建鹏 张瀚武 QIAO Huiyun;XU Haohui;CHEN Yu;WEI Jianpeng;ZHANG Hanwu(College of Civil Engineering,Fujian University of Technology,Fuzhou 350118,China;College of Civil Engineering,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350116,China;Anhui Institute of Building Research&Design,Heifei 230031,China;Fujian Yongdongnan Construction Group Co.,Ltd,Yongtai 350700,China)
出处 《建筑结构学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第11期102-113,共12页 Journal of Building Structures
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(52078138) 福建省科技厅自然科学基金项目(2020J01886) 福州市科技计划项目(2020-GX-23)。
关键词 钢框架 连续性倒塌 悬链线效应 弯折钢筋 Pushdown加载试验 数值模拟 二次防御设计 steel frame structure progressive collapse catenary action kinked reinforced bar Pushdown loading test numerical simulation secondary defense design
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1李易,陆新征,叶列平,陈适才.基于Pushdown分析的RC框架抗连续倒塌承载力研究[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2011,27(1):10-18. 被引量:40
  • 2GSA2003 Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization project [ S ]. Washington DC : United States General Services Administration, 2003.
  • 3DoD2010 Design of structures to resist progressive collapse[ S]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2010.
  • 4Powell G. Progressive collapse case studies using nonlinear analysis [ C -//Metropolis & Beyond: Proceeding of ASCE/SEI Structures Conference. New York: ASCE/SEI, 2005.
  • 5Marjanishvili S M, Agnew E. Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis [ J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 2006, 20(4) : 365-374.
  • 6Ruth P, Marchand S M, equivalency in progressive Williamson E B. Static collapse alternate path analysis : reducing conservatism while retaining structural integrity[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 2006, 20 (4): 349- 364.
  • 7Dusenberry D O, Hamburger R O. Practical means for energy-based analyses of disproportionate collapse potential [ J ]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2006, 20(4): 336-348.
  • 8Izzuddin B A, Vlassis A G, Elghazouli A Y, et al. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss: part I: simplified assessment framework[ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30 ( 5 ) : 1308-1318.
  • 9Vlassis A G, Izzuddin B A, Elghazouli A Y, et al. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss : part II : application[ J ]. Engineering Structures ,2008, 30(5 ) : 1424-1438.
  • 10Pujol S, Smith-Pardo J P. A new perspective on the effects of abrupt column removal [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(4):869-874.

共引文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部