耳穴压豆结合中药熏洗在肛肠疾病术后干预中的应用

Auricular point pressing bean combined with fumigation and washing with traditional Chinese medicine in postoperative intervention of anorectal diseases Application of

目的分析治疗肛肠疾病术后患者时,采取耳穴压豆结合中药熏洗的价值。方法本院2020年11月至2021年12月收治的80例肛肠疾病患者,均采取手术治疗,随机数字表法分对照组(行基础治疗)、观察组(行耳穴压豆结合中药熏洗),比较效果。结果观察组每日排便次数低于对照组[(3.22±0.25):(6.12±1.14),t=15.715,P<0.05];观察组大便性状评分高于对照组[(89.47±5.26)分:(74.23±12.15)分,t=7.280,P<0.05];观察组大便性状评分高于对照组[(88.41±7.26)分:(78.39±10.26)分,t=5.042,P<0.05];观察组排便感觉阈值高于对照组[(120.72±21.46)ml:(110.47±10.28)ml,t=2.724,P<0.05];观察组肛管静息压低于对照组[(9.07±1.58)kPa:(11.39±2.14)kPa,t=5.516,P<0.05];观察组VAS评分低于对照组[(3.32±1.43)分:(6.05±1.04)分,t=9.765,P<0.05];观察组水肿消退时间短于对照组[(14.18±2.23)d:(18.03±5.26)d,t=4.262,P<0.05];观察组出血量低于对照组[(8.29±1.26)ml:(25.41±5.33)ml,t=19.770,P<0.05];观察组复发次数低于对照组[(2.21±0.43)次:(5.46±1.12)次,t=17.133,P<0.05];观察组并发症发生率低于对照组[2.50%:20.00%,χ^(2)=4.507,P<0.05]。结论肛肠疾病术后患者采取耳穴压豆结合中药熏洗治疗,提高治疗效果。

Objective To analyze the value of fumigation with Chinese medicine when treating patients with anorectal diseases.Methods The 80 patients with anorectal diseases admitted from November 2020 to December 2021 were treated by surgery,including control group(basic treatment)and observation group(ear point pressure beans combined with traditional Chinese medicine fumigation)to compare the effect.Results The number of daily bowel movements in the observation group was lower than that in the control group[(3.22±0.25):(6.12±1.14),t=15.715,P<0.05].The stool trait score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group[(89.47±5.26)score:(74.23±12.15)score,t=7.280,P<0.05].The stool trait score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group[(88.41±7.26)score:(78.39±10.26)score,t=5.042,P<0.05].The defecation sensation threshold of the observation group was higher than that of the control group[(120.72±21.46)ml:(110.47±10.28)ml,t=2.724,P<0.05];The resting pressure of the anal canal was observed and lower than that of the control group[(9.07±1.58)kPa:(11.39±2.14)kPa,t=5.516,P<0.05].The VAS score of the observation group waslower than that of the control group[(3.32±1.43)score:(6.05±1.04)score,t=9.765,P<0.05].The regression time of edema regression in the observed group was shorter than that in the control group[(14.18±2.23)d:(18.03±5.26)d,t=4.262,P<0.05].The amount of bleeding in the observed group was lower than that in the control group[(8.29±1.26)ml:(25.41±5.33)ml,t=19.770,P<0.05],The number of recurrence in the observation group was lower than that in the control group[(2.21±0.43):(5.46±1.12),t=17.133,P<0.05].The complication rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group[2.50%:20.00%,χ^(2)=4.507,P<0.05].Conclusion Traditional Chinese medicine hashigh clinical value and can improve the treatment effect and improve the anal function.