期刊文献+

外语学习者口语表现的任务复杂度效应探究——基于应用语言学指标与计量语言学指标的对比

Effetts of Task complexity on EFL learners' oral performance:A comparison between applied linguistics measures and quantitative linguistics measures
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究通过对比应用语言学和计量语言学词汇指标,基于大规模学习者语料库考察口语表现的任务复杂度效应。结果表明,前者只在词汇密度和词汇复杂度上体现显著影响,而后者在词汇变化性、词汇密度、词汇复杂度方面都能测量任务复杂度效应且能捕捉语言产出的细微变化;相较于应用语言学指标,计量指标呈现非线性变化趋势,更贴合人类语言的复杂动态变化特征。本研究表明数据驱动的计量语言学方法可拓展二语习得领域核心问题的研究。 Based on a large learner corpus,this study aims to make a comparison between lexical measures in applied linguistics and those in quantitative linguistics to investigate the effects of task complexity on linguistic complexity in Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language learners' oral texts.The results show that measures in applied linguistics reflect task complexity effects on learners' oral performance only in the dimensions of lexical density and lexical sophistication,while quantitative metrics can measure task complexity effects in all three dimensions of lexical variation,lexical density and lexical sophistication,and capture the nuanced changes in tasks with varying degrees of complexity.Compared with measures in applied linguistics,the changes of quantitative measures display non-linear tendencies,which embodies the complex and dynamic changes of human language.The study demonstrates that the data-driven quantitative linguistic method can extend the research on core issues in second language acquisition.
作者 刘飞凤 郑咏滟 LIU Feifeng;ZHENG Yongyan
机构地区 上海中学 复旦大学
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 北大核心 2023年第5期55-64,共10页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金 2018年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国外语环境下学习者书面语的动态系统发展研究”(18BYY113)的阶段性成果。
关键词 计量语言学指标 应用语言学指标 任务复杂度 词汇复杂性 学习者语料库 quantitative linguistics measures applied linguistics measures task complexity lexical complexity learnercorpus
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献48

  • 1谭晓晨.中国英语学习者产出性词汇发展研究[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(3):202-207. 被引量:85
  • 2Baba, K. & R. Nitta. 2014. Phase transition in development of writing fluency from a com- plex dynamic systems perspective [J]. Language Learning 64: 1-35.
  • 3Caspi, T. & W. Lowie. 2010. A dynamic perspective on L2 lexical development in academic English [A]. In R. Chacon-Beltran, C. Abello-Contesse & M. Torreblanca-Lopez (eds.). Insights into Non-native Vocabulary Teaching and Learning [C]. Bristol: Multi- lingual Matters: 41-58.
  • 4de Bot, K., W. Lowie & M. Verspoor. 2007. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition [J]. Bilingualism : Language and Cognition 10: 7-21.
  • 5Horst, M. & L. Collins. 2006. From faible to strong: How does their vocabulary grow? [J]. Canadian Modern Language Review 63 : 83-106.
  • 6Jarvis, S. 2002. Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity [J]. Language Testing 19: 57-84.
  • 7Kojima, M. &J. Yamashita. 2014. Reliability of lexical richness measures based on word lists in short second language productions [J]. System 42: 23-33.
  • 8Larsen-Freeman, D. 2006. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English [J]. Applied Linguistics 27: 590-619.
  • 9Larsen-Freeman, D. & L. Cameron. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 10Laufer, B. 1998. The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? [J]. Applied Linguistics 19: 255-271.

共引文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部