海源阁旧藏“元本《史记》”考

Textual Research on Shi Ji(Records of the Grand Historian)in Haiyuan Pavilion Library

杨绍和《楹书隅录》著录的“元本《史记》”,在海源阁书散后,曾由王子霖藻玉堂送傅增湘先生经眼,但之后一度下落不明,直到最近浙江大学图书馆在整理袁氏赠书中才被发现。通过实物研究,可以认定此本确如傅氏所言是明游明本。众人误判的原因是:①游明本版式与中统本相近,明代前期建阳刻本继承了元代的字体风格;②此本属后印本,后印时正文卷端和《史记集解序》中“丰城游明大升校正”木记已被剜;③有“丰城游明大升校正新增”木记的《史记正义序》等5篇已被全部抽走,书内已不见任何游明痕迹;④董浦序后半叶为割补,据正德慎独斋刻本补抄的“皇元”二字误导了众人。

The woodblock-printed Shi Ji(Records of the Grand Historian)of Yuan Dynasty annotated by Yang Shaohe in his Ying Shu Yu Lu was once lost after Fu Zengxiang looked over it,until the author found it recently in the Yuan’s complimentary books collected in the library of Zhejiang University.Through the physical research,it can be concluded that this edition is indeed a woodblock-printed which reprinted by You Ming as Fu said.The reasons for people’s misjudgment are as follows:①As a re-carved edition,its characteristics are similar to that of the Zhongtong edition,and Jianyang engraving edition in the early Ming Dynasty inherited the font style of the Yuan Dynasty;②As a post printed edition,the wooden records of“Fengcheng You Ming Da Sheng Corrected”have been gouged out;③Five articles in this book,including Shi Ji Zheng Yi Xu,which with a wooden record of“Fengcheng You Ming Da Sheng Corrected and Added”have been taken away,so there is no any trace of You Ming;④The last seven lines of Dong Pu's Preface was cut off,and the words‘Huang Yuan’in supplementary copy on the basis of Shen Du Zhai’s edition which copied in Ming dynasty misled some people.