期刊文献+

从“反对阐释”到“不可再现”——论艺术调节中的“缺陷”之美

From“Against Interpretation”to“Unrepresentable”:On the Beauty of“Defects”in Artistic Coordination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 艺术再现的特定模式会导致感性与理性之间产生一道“沟壑”。苏珊·桑塔格的“反对阐释”论和雅克·朗西埃的“不可再现”论同时提到了艺术审美体验中会面对的感知阈限和理性阐释问题。二者都强调对忽视艺术主体性的批评,在这个问题上形成了互文共通:不应在阐释中过于强调内容和形式,而忽略作品本身的价值;也不应在表现中过于在意可再现物,却忽略掉作品自身发出的、需要被体会的内容和意蕴。二者虽然在阐述主体和阐述角度上有着根本的不同,但都是在试图通过受众的思维方式、生活底蕴、感知能力和艺术审美去揭示更多的潜在可能性,挖掘模式化审美背后的艺术感受力和内在价值体验。 The specific mode of artistic representation leads to a“gap”between sensibility and rationality.Susan Sontag's theory of“Against Interpretation”and Jacques Ranciere's theory of“Unrepresentable”simultaneously mentioned the problems of perception threshold and rational interpretation that will be faced in artistic aesthetic experience.Both emphasize criticism of the neglect of artistic subjectivity,forming intertextual commonality on this issue.We should not overemphasize content and form in interpretation,while neglecting the value of the work itself;neither should we overly focus on representable objects in representation,while ignoring the content and meaning that the work itself emits and needs to be understood.Although there are fundamental disparities in the subject and perspective of elaboration between the two,both approaches aim to reveal more potential possibilities through the audience's way of thinking,life experiences,perception ability,and artistic aesthetics,and to explore the artistic perception and intrinsic value experience behind formalized aesthetics.
作者 王玉辉 何皓 Wang Yuhui;He Hao
出处 《艺术传播研究》 CSSCI 2023年第3期15-23,共9页 Journal of Art Communication
关键词 “反对阐释” “不可再现” 艺术本体 艺术传播 “Against Interpretation” "Unrepresentable" artistic ontology artistic communication
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献3

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部