期刊文献+

提高伦理定期跟踪审查监管的实践经验分享

Practical experience sharing of improving the ethics supervision to periodic follow-up review
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的改变定期跟踪审查管理相对薄弱的现状,进一步提高伦理委员会持续跟踪审查能力。方法通过梳理分析定期跟踪审查中存在的问题,采取相应的解决措施。细化管理要求,加强日常监督。专项伦理培训并加强沟通以增强研究者的伦理意识。优化伦理办公室人员分工提高工作效率和委员定期跟踪审查质量。信息化审查系统助力加强定期跟踪提醒等。结果在实践工作中,定期跟踪的迟报、漏报情况明显减少,提高了伦理委员会对定期跟踪审查的监管能力。结论定期跟踪审查中,只有研究机构、伦理委员会、研究者各方足够重视,各尽其责,积极配合才能有效提高定期跟踪审查质量。 Objective To change the current situation of the relatively weak management of periodic follow-up review,and further to improve the continuous review capacity of the ethics committee.Methods Through sorting out and analyzing the problems existing in the periodic follow-up review,corresponding solutions are taken:to detail management requirements;to strengthen daily supervision;special ethics training and communication to enhance the ethical awareness of researchers;to optimize the division of labor in the ethics office to improve work efficiency and the quality of committee review;the information review system helps strengthen tracking and reminding.Results In one year′s practice,the omission of periodic follow-up has been significantly reduced,and the supervision ability of the Ethics Committee on periodic follow-up review has been improved.Conclusions In periodic follow-up review,research institutions,ethics committees and researchers pay enough attention to fulfill their responsibilities and actively cooperate can effectively improve the quality of periodic follow-up review.
作者 丛翠翠 王方 Cong Cuicui;Wang Fang(Clinical Trial Research Center,Beijing Hospital,National Center of Gerontology Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《中华医学科研管理杂志》 2023年第5期360-363,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基金 北京大学人民医院院内研究与发展基金(2147000958)。
关键词 伦理委员会 定期跟踪审查 监管 Ethics Committee Periodic follow-up review Supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献85

  • 1黄春春,陈昭辉.论医学伦理委员会的意义和发展[J].中国医学伦理学,2005,18(2):68-70. 被引量:24
  • 2伍蓉.美国西部伦理委员会(WIRB)培训体验[J].中国医学伦理学,2006,19(4):20-22. 被引量:11
  • 3Norton K, Wilson D M. Continuing Ethics Review Practices by Ca- nadian Research Ethics Boards [J].IRB: Ethics b- Human Re- search, 2008,30(3) : 10-- 14.
  • 4Kim O J, Park B J, Sohn D R, et al. Current Status of the Institu tional Review Boards in Korea: Constitution, Operation, and Poli- cy for Protection of Human Research Participants[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 2003,18 : 3-- 10.
  • 5佚名.黄金大米事件的背后:转基因"伦理审查"乱象[EB/OL].(2012-09-17)[2013-01-23].http://henan.163.com/12/0917/08/8BJFSRTK022701S63.html.
  • 6Czarkowski M, Roanowski K. Polish Research Ethics Committees in the European Union System of Assessing Medical Experiments [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics,2009,15(2) :201-212.
  • 7Fitzgerald M H, Phillips P A, Yule E. The Research Ethics Review Process and Ethics Review Narratives[J]. Ethics & Behavior,2006, 16(4) :377--395.
  • 8柯斌铮.对医院伦理委员会建设的几点认识[J].医学与哲学(A),2007,28(12):3-5. 被引量:9
  • 9刘激扬,田勇泉.提高生命科学研究中的伦理审查质量的思考[J].医学与哲学(A),2007,28(12):8-9. 被引量:9
  • 10World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration oI Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects[J . JAMA, 2013,310(27) :2191--2194.

共引文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部