期刊文献+

腹腔神经丛毁损术联合度洛西汀治疗中枢介导性腹痛综合征的疗效

Efficacy of celiac plexus destruction combined with duloxetine in the treatment of centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察腹腔神经丛毁损术联合度洛西汀治疗中枢介导性腹痛综合征(CAPS)的临床疗效及安全性。方法 纳入我院收治的40例CAPS患者,将其分为观察组和对照组,对照组采用度洛西汀治疗,观察组在对照组治疗的基础上加用腹腔神经丛毁损术治疗。分别于治疗前及治疗后1周、4周、12周、24周采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)评估患者心理健康状态,采用简化McGill疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)评估患者腹痛缓解情况,比较2组患者治疗后并发症发生率。结果 与治疗前比较,观察组治疗后1~12周SF-MPQ评分显著下降(P<0.05),治疗后24周下降极为显著(P<0.01),而对照组在治疗后12周才显著下降(P<0.05);治疗后1周、4周、12周,观察组SF-MPQ评分与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但治疗后24周观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。2组患者治疗后12周内SCL-90评分组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),2组患者治疗后24周SCL-90评分较治疗前显著下降(P<0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 腹腔神经丛毁损术联合度洛西汀治疗CAPS可以快速且有效地缓解患者症状,且有良好的安全性。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of celiac plexus destruction combined with duloxetine in the treatment of centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome(CAPS).Methods A total of 40 CAPS patients admitted to our hospital were divided into the observation group and the control group.The control group was treated with duloxetine,and the observation group was treated with celiac plexus destruction on the basis of the control group.The mental health states of patients before treatment and 1 week,4 weeks,12 weeks,and 24 weeks after treatment were evaluated by the symptom checklist 90(SCL-90),respectively.The short-form McGill pain questionnaire(SF-MPQ)was used to evaluate the relief of abdominal pain.The incidence of complications after treatment was compared between the two groups of patients.Results Compared with before treatment,the SF-MPQ scores 1 to 12 weeks after treatment in the observation group decreased significantly(P<0.05),and the decrease was extremely significant 24 weeks after treatment(P<0.01);while the SF-MPQ score in the control group only significantly decreased 12 weeks after treatment(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the SF-MPQ scores after 1 week,4 weeks and 12 weeks of treatment between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05),but the observation group was better than the control group 24 weeks after treatment(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the SCL-90 scores within 12 weeks after treatment between the two groups(P>0.05),and the SCL-90 scores 24 weeks after treatment of the two groups decreased significantly compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Celiac plexus destruction combined with duloxetine in the treatment of CAPS can relieve the symptoms of patients quickly and effectively,and has a good safety.
作者 蔡少康 兰伟文 董军立 姚宪宝 蔡毅 CAI Shao-kang;LAN Wei-wen;DONG Jun-li;YAO Xian-bao;CAI Yi(Department of Pain,Wuhan Central Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan Hubei 430061,China)
出处 《局解手术学杂志》 2023年第11期994-997,共4页 Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
基金 武汉市卫生计划委员会基金项目(WH21Z58)。
关键词 腹腔神经丛毁损术 中枢介导性腹痛综合征 功能性腹痛综合征 度洛西汀 celiac plexus destruction centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome functional abdominal pain syndrome duloxetine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1董承海,谢益宽,谢作磊,樊继云.Ectopic discharges trigger sympathetic sprouting in rat dorsal root ganglia following peripheral nerve injury[J].Science China(Life Sciences),2002,45(2):191-200. 被引量:6
  • 2刘江泽,李英,易长虹,王光亚,谢孝平.腹腔神经丛阻滞术治疗上腹部顽固性癌性疼痛[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2005,2(2):127-129. 被引量:6
  • 3Yarmohammadi H, Nakamoto DA, Azar N, et al. Percutaneouscomputed tomography guided cryoablation of the celiac plexus asan alternative treatment for intractable pain caused by pancreaticcancer. J Cancer Res Ther, 2011, 7(4) :481-483.
  • 4Kim WH, Lee CJ, Sim WS, et al. Anatomical analysis of compu-ted tomography images for determining the optimal oblique fluoro-scope angle for percutaneous coeliac plexus block. J Int Med Res,2011,39(5):1798-1807.
  • 5Kambadakone A, Thabet A, Gervais DA, et al. CT-guided celiac?plexus neurolysis: A review of anatomy, indications, technique,and tips for successful treatment. Radiographics, 2011,31(6):1599-1621.
  • 6Yang FR, Wu BS, Lai GH, et al. Assessment o? consecutiveneurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) technique outcomes in themanagement of refractory visceral cancer pain. Pain Med, 2012,13(4):518-521.
  • 7Koizuka S, Nakajima K, Mieda R. CT-guided nerve block: a re-view of the features of CT fluoroscopic guidance for nerve blocks.J Anesth, 2014, 28(1) : 94-101.
  • 8Loukas M, Klaassen Z, Merbs W, et al. A review of the thoracicsplanchnic nerves and celiac ganglia. Clin Anat, 2010,23(5) :512-522.
  • 9Erdek MA, Halpert DE, Gonzalez FM, et al. Assessment of ce-liac plexus block and neurolysis outcomes and technique in themanagement of refractory visceral cancer pain. Pain Med, 2010,11(1):92-100.
  • 10姜长林,张丽红,苏芳,曲向林,罗宏柏.在体大鼠经背侧入路不同浓度乙醇腹腔神经丛阻滞后神经丛组织学改变的观察[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2008,14(1):36-38. 被引量:2

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部