期刊文献+

国际航空碳减排措施下的航空碳排放争端解决路径研究

Dispute Settlement Path of Aviation Carbon Emission under Carbon Emission Reduction Measures for International Aviation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了推动国际民用航空绿色低碳的进程,国际民用航空组织(ICAO)出台了“一揽子”措施,包括技术型降碳和市场机制降碳——国际航空碳抵消和减排计划(CORSIA)。“一揽子”措施目前还处于初步试行阶段,其中,由于CORSIA具体实施的环节牵涉主体较多——ICAO、国家、航空公司等主体之间的交集将不可避免地会产生国际争端、私人当事方之间的争端、混合争端三类争端。然而,传统国际和私人层面的争端解决机制在专业能力、权威性、管辖权等方面都有所欠缺,因此主导“一揽子”措施的ICAO理事会成为理想的争端解决平台。但ICAO理事会所主张的《国际民用航空公约》第84条下的争端解决机制,由于组织结构的缺陷多年来并未真正发挥其司法职能。尽管ICAO理事会已经将争端解决机制改革提上日程,但考虑到“一揽子”措施引发争端的复杂性质以及争端解决的最终目的,充分发挥ICAO理事会的行政职能并在ICAO理事会下设立一个常设的争端解决委员会将是一种更为可行的选择。 In order to promote the green and low-carbon development of international civil aviation,the International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO)has introduced a package of measures by means of Carbon Offsetting and Emission Reduction Scheme for International Aviation(CORSIA),including technology-based carbon reduction and market-based carbon reduction.At present,the package of measures is still in its preliminary trial stage,and because many subjects are involved in the specific implementation of CORSIA,the intersection among ICAO,the states,air-lines and other parties will inevitably lead to disputes in three types:international disputes,disputes between private parties and mixed disputes.However,the traditional dispute settlement mechanisms at the international and private levels lack expertise,authority and jurisdiction,making the ICAO Council,which plays a dominant role in the pac-kage of measures,an ideal dispute settlement platform.But the dispute settlement mechanism under Article 84 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation advocated by the Council,has not fulfilled its judicial function for many years due to the defects of its organizational structure.Although the Council has put the reform of dispute settlement mechanism on its agenda,given the complex nature of the disputes arising from the package of measures and the ulti-mate goal of dispute settlement,it will be more feasible to give full play to the administrative functions of the ICAO Council and establish a permanent dispute settlement committee under the Council.
作者 杨彩霞 王梓 YANG Caixia;WANG Zi(Law School,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China)
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第6期162-172,共11页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(72273138)。
关键词 国际航空碳减排措施 争端解决机制 ICAO理事会 司法职能 行政职能 carbon emission reduction measures for international aviation dispute settlement mechanism ICAO Council judicial function administrative function
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献12

  • 1龚宇.《欧盟航空减排新规:法律辨析与应对》,(2011年中国国际经济法学会年会暨学术研讨会论文集》(第一卷),第419页.
  • 2王玉玮.欧共体/欧盟与GATT/WTO的法律关系问题研究[M]北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2010134.
  • 3赵维田.国际航空法[M]北京:社会科学文献出版社,200021-22.
  • 4Ruwantissa Abeyrane. The decision of the european court of justice on open skies-how can we take liberaliation to the next level[J].Air Law and Commerce,2003,(02):485-486.
  • 5焦小平.欧盟排放交易体系规则[M]北京:中国财政经济出版社,20109-10.
  • 6Lorand Bartels. The inclusion of aviation in the EU's ETS:WTO consideration[J].Biores,2012,(01):4-8.
  • 7成帅华.把中国航空业纳入欧盟碳交易系统:影响和对策[J]桥,2011(02):5-8.
  • 8林鹏.欧盟航空ETS争端日趋白热化[J].中国民用航空,2011(10):1-1. 被引量:1
  • 9周亚光.ETS指令的法律遗产:国家与外国航空企业间航空争端解决的投资仲裁路径[J].河北法学,2013,31(10):188-195. 被引量:2
  • 10周亚光.国际民用航空组织争端解决机制司法化改革论析[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2020,38(1):152-160. 被引量:6

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部