摘要
目前,我国的跨境破产仅依靠《企业破产法》第5条,此规定在跨境破产管辖权制度的司法实践过程中存在一些问题。具体表现为:我国跨境破产管辖权制度存在着管辖权审查标准单一,未区分主要破产程序与非主要程序以及辅助程序的缺失等问题。基于此,可借鉴其他国家的立法经验,在明确主要利益中心为管辖权审查标准的基础上,区分主要破产程序与非主要程序,并启动我国的跨境破产辅助程序,以完善我国的跨境破产管辖权制度。
Currently,China's cross-border bankruptcy only relies on Article 5 of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law,which sets up an obstacle for the effective application of the cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction system in judicial practice with its overly simplistic provisions.At this stage,there are several problems with China's cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction system,such as a single standard for jurisdictional review,lack of distinction between main and non-main bankruptcy procedures,and the absence of subsidiary procedures.Therefore,we should draw on the legislative experience of the other countries.On the basis of clarifying the main interest center as the standard for jurisdictional review,differentiation should be made between main and nonmain bankruptcy procedures,and China should initiate its cross-border bankruptcy subsidiary procedures to improve its crossborder bankruptcy jurisdiction system.
作者
刘诗琦
LIU Shi-qi(Changchun University of Technology Humanities and Information School,Changchun,Jilin,China,130122)
出处
《广东开放大学学报》
2023年第5期43-49,共7页
JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY
关键词
跨境破产管辖权
主要利益中心
平行程序
辅助破产程序
跨境破产合作
cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction
main interest center
parallel program
auxiliary bankruptcy procedure
cross-border bankruptcy cooperation