期刊文献+

草酸艾司西酞普兰联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗首发单相抑郁症的疗效及对患者注意功能的影响 被引量:1

Effect of escitalopram combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on efficacy and attention function of patients with first-episode unipolar depression
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨草酸艾司西酞普兰联合重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗首发单相抑郁症患者的疗效以及该联合治疗方案对患者注意功能的影响。方法:前瞻性选择广州市第一人民医院神经内科自2022年3月至2023年4月收治的52例首次发病且未予任何治疗措施的单相抑郁症患者为研究对象,患者分别在服用草酸艾司西酞普兰抗抑郁治疗的基础上接受长达4周(每周5 d,共20 d)的左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)rTMS真刺激(真刺激组, n=27)或伪刺激(伪刺激组, n=25)。分别于治疗前及治疗第2、4周末,应用汉密尔顿抑郁量表24项(HAMD-24)测评患者的抑郁症状严重程度,以及应用中国伯明翰认知筛查量表(BCoS-C)的听觉注意测试项目评估患者的听觉注意程度。 结果:(1)抑郁症状:真刺激组患者治疗第2、4周末的HAMD-24评分[(20.63±2.73)分、(15.85±2.43)分]均明显低于治疗前[(25.74±2.68)分],伪刺激组患者治疗第4周末的HAMD-24评分亦较治疗前明显降低[(20.48±2.33)分 vs. (25.80±2.57)分],差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。治疗第2、4周末时,真刺激组患者的HAMD-24评分均明显低于伪刺激组,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。(2)听觉注意功能:真刺激组患者治疗第4周末的总正确数较治疗前明显升高(51.74±1.38 vs. 47.48±1.60),持续指标较治疗前明显降低(0.74±0.71 vs. 4.37±1.15),差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。治疗第4周末时,真刺激组患者的总正确数较伪刺激组(48.00±1.66)明显升高,持续指标较伪刺激组(3.72±1.28)明显降低,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。 结论:草酸艾司西酞普兰联合rTMS能更快速有效地改善单相抑郁症患者的抑郁症状及注意功能,其中抑郁症状较注意功能能更快得到改善。 Objective To observe the effect of escitalopram combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)on efficacy and attention function in patients with first-episode unipolar depression.Methods Fifty-two first-episode initial-naive unipolar depression patients were enrolled in Department of Neurology of Guangzhou First People's Hospital from March 2022 to April 2023 were chosen.They were randomly allocated to active stimulation group(n=27)and sham stimulation group(n=25);both were treated with escitalopram,and active treatment or sham treatment in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex(DLPFC)were given for 4 weeks(5 d per week,20 d totally).Before treatment and 2 and 4 weeks after treatment,Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD)-24 was used to evaluate depressive symptoms,and Birmingham Cognitive Screening Scale-Chinese(BCoS-C)was used to evaluate the attention function.Results(1)In terms of depressive symptoms:HAMD-24 scores of the active stimulation group 2 and 4 weeks after treatment(20.63±2.73,15.85±2.43)were significantly lower than those before treatment(25.74±2.68,P<0.05);HAMD-24 scores of sham stimulation group 4 weeks after treatment were also significantly lower than those before treatment([20.48±2.33]vs.[25.80±2.57],P<0.05);HAMD-24 scores of the active stimulation group 2 and 4 weeks after treatment were significantly lower than those of sham stimulation group(P<0.05).(2)In terms of auditory attention indicators:total correct number(selective attention)in active stimulation group 4 weeks after treatment was significantly larger than that before treatment(51.74±1.38 vs.47.48±1.60),and the sustained index(sustained attention)was significantly lower than that before treatment(0.74±0.71 vs.4.37±1.15,P<0.05);total correct number in active stimulation group 4 weeks after treatment was significantly larger than that in sham stimulation group(48.00±1.66),and the sustained index was significantly lower than that in sham stimulation group(3.72±1.28,P<0.05).Conclusion Combined with escitalopram,rTMS can more effectively mitigate the depressive symptoms in first-episode unipolar depression patients,and depressive symptoms improve more quickly than attentional function.
作者 胡键浠 陈浩博 黄华锰 胡蓉 胡桂和 郭爱华 李曼 邓慧琨 潘小平 Hu Jianxi;Chen Haobo;Huang Huameng;Hu Rong;Hu Guihe;Guo Aihua;Li Man;Deng Huikun;Pan Xiaoping(Department of Neurology,Guangzhou First People's Hospital,Guangzhou 510180,China)
出处 《中华神经医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第10期1038-1043,共6页 Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
基金 广州市卫生健康科技项目(20221A011006)。
关键词 抑郁症 草酸艾司西酞普兰 经颅重复磁刺激 注意功能 背外侧前额叶皮质 Major depressive disorder Escitalopram Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation Attention function Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

  • 1Wang L Zang Y He Y Liang M Zhang X Tian L Wu T Jiang T Li K.Changes in hippocampal connectivity in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease: evidence from resting state fMRI[J].中国生物学文摘,2006,20(8):33-33. 被引量:4
  • 2杜静,汪凯,董毅,范津,朱春燕,靳胜春.抑郁症的注意网络功能研究[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2006,32(5):441-443. 被引量:15
  • 3胡孝朋,鹿麒麟,金珏,于璟,杜雪梅,张延军,刘岩岩,唐一源.应用SPECT探索抑郁症局部脑血流变化规律[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(9):1418-1420. 被引量:7
  • 4喻东山,葛茂宏.精神科合理用药手册[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2011:29.
  • 5Heaton RK. Wisconsin card sorting test manual [ M ]. Florida : Psy- chological Assessment Resources Inc, 1998:39 - 52.
  • 6殷青云.孤独症的临床特征,认知功能及5-HT启动子区域多肽性研究[C].中南大学博士论文,2005.
  • 7Henkel V, Seemuller F, Obermeier M, et al. Does early improve- ment triggered by antidepressants predict response/remission? A- nalysis of data from a naturalistic study on a large sample of inpa- tients with major depression [ J ]. J Affect Disord, 2009,115 ( 4 ) : 439 - 449.
  • 8Yang Y,Cook DG. Presenilin- 1 deficiency impairs glutamate- e- voked intracellular calcium responses in neurons [ J ]. Neuro- science,2004,124 (3) :501.
  • 9Zangen A, Hyodo K. Transcranial magnetic stimulaqtion induces in- creases in extracellular levels of dopamine and glutamate in the nu- cleus accumbens [ J ]. Neuroreport ,2002,13 (12) :2401 - 2405.
  • 10Pasley BN, Allen E, Freeman RD. State - dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex [ J ]. Neuron ,2009,62 (2) :291 - 303.

共引文献65

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部