期刊文献+

瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚复合麻醉联合手术室护理对甲状腺癌根治术患者的效果 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析甲状腺癌根治术患者行瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚复合麻醉联合手术室护理治疗,对其术后恢复情况的应用。方法选取2021年7月至2022年12月广元市第一人民医院诊治的行甲状腺癌根治术治疗的82例患者,以随机数字表法分为对照组(术中接受芬太尼、丙泊酚复合麻醉,41例)和观察组(术中接受瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚复合麻醉,41例),均实施手术室护理干预。对患者术后恢复情况,血流动力学、炎症与应激反应指标、疼痛情况进行比较。结果与对照组比,观察组患者自主呼吸恢复、拔管、睁眼时间均缩短;与麻醉前(T_(0))比,气管插管时(T_(1))、切皮时(T_(2))对照组患者心率、舒张压、收缩压水平逐渐升高;与术前比,术后24 h两组患者炎症、应激3项指标(白细胞介素-6、去甲肾上腺素、皮质醇)水平均升高;术后1、12、24 h视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分逐渐降低,上述所有指标术后组间比较,观察组更低(均P<0.05)。两组血氧饱和度组间、组内比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论甲状腺癌根治术患者行瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚复合麻醉联合手术室护理,可血稳定流动力学,减轻炎症与应激反应,有利于加快康复进程。
出处 《现代医学与健康研究电子杂志》 2023年第20期125-127,共3页 Modern Medicine and Health Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献85

  • 1ZHURui-sen YUYong-li LUHan-kui LUOQuan-yong CHENLi-bo.Clinical study of 312 cases with matastatic differentiated thyroid cancer treated with large doses of ^(131)I[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2005(5):425-428. 被引量:10
  • 2Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, et al. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth, 2009, 201 ( 3 ) : 408-417.
  • 3Wadhwa A, Kandadai SK, Tongpresert S, et aL Ultrasound guidance for deep peripheral nerve blocks: a brief review. Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2011, 7(27): 1-6.
  • 4Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray M J, et aL Clinical Anesthesiology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006: 324-327.
  • 5Mason SE, Noel-Storr A, Ritchie CW. The impact of general and regional anesthesia on the incidence of post-operative cognitive dysfunction and postoperative delirium. J Alzheimers Dis, 2010, 22(3) : 67-79.
  • 6Gallagher EJ,Bijur PE, Latimer C, et al. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED [ J ]. Am J Emerg Med, 2002, 20(4) : 287 -290.
  • 7Marques AP,Assumpcao A, Matsutani LA, et al. Pain in fibromyalgia and discrimination power of the instruments : visual analog scale, dolor- imetry and the McGill pain questionnaire [ J ]. Acta Reumatol Port, 2008, 33(3) : 345 -351.
  • 8Hjermstad M J, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, et al. Studies comparing nu- merical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review[J]. ] Pain Symptom Manage, 2011,41(6) : 1073 -1093.
  • 9Shields B J, Cohen DM,Harbeek - Weber C, et al. Pediatric pain meas- urement using a visual analogue scale: a comparison of two teaching methods [ J ]. Clin Pediatr ( Phila), 2003, 42 (3) : 227 - 234.
  • 10Briggs M, Closs JS. A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients [ J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 1999, 18 (6) 438 - 446.

共引文献618

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部