摘要
作为海归博士回国就业的主要平台,高校承担的教育教学和科学研究职能使法学专业海归博士面临“再本土化”的过程。基于江浙京粤地区的调研发现,法学专业海归博士教育教学“再本土化”的历程大致可以分为阵痛期、瓶颈期与分化期。法学专业海归博士回国任教后的教育教学困境使高校对其青睐程度骤减。与本土博士相比,法学专业海归博士并不一定具备教育教学方面的优势,反而历经更为漫长的阵痛期与瓶颈期。为了激发法学专业海归博士的教学潜能,海归博士应当将学缘优势与本土问题意识融合,依托比较法学研究方法提升自身的教学与科研水平,高校也应当构建常态化教学考核机制。
As the main employment platform for returned overseas doctors,the education and scientific research functions undertaken by universities have led to a process of“re-localization”for returned overseas doctors majoring in law.Based on research in Jiangsu,Zhejiang,Beijing,and Guangdong,it has been found that the process of“re-localization”in the education and teaching of returned overseas doctorates in the field of law can be roughly divided into a painful period,a bottleneck period,and a differentiation period.The teaching difficulties faced by returned overseas doctors majoring in law have led to a sharp decrease in their popularity among universities.Compared with local doctoral students,returned doctoral students majoring in law do not necessarily have advantages in teaching,but instead go through longer periods of pain and bottleneck.In order to stimulate the teaching potential of returned overseas doctors,they should integrate their academic advantages with the awareness of local issues and rely on comparative law methods to improve their teaching and research levels,while universities should also establish standardized teaching assessment mechanisms.
作者
杨帆
YANG Fan(Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225127)
出处
《中国高教研究》
北大核心
2023年第10期72-78,共7页
China Higher Education Research
基金
扬州大学教学改革研究课题“涉外法治人才培养背景下法学专业双语课程建设”(YZUJX2021—C3)的研究成果。
关键词
海归博士
教学方法
教学内容
比较法学
returned overseas doctors
teaching methods
teaching content
comparative law