太阳社、我们社与革命文学论争

Sun Society,Our Society and the Revolutionary Literature Controversy

太阳社与我们社并非某些学人所想的“铁板一块”,且正是由于有着多重差异,才使得创造社、太阳社与我们社形成了三股左翼文学力量。在“革命文学论争”过程中,创造社和太阳社以自办刊物为平台,批评了新月派乃至整个文艺界,但我们社根本没有也不愿“围攻”鲁迅,且其更为注重文艺创作。太阳社“携着”我们社参与“革命文学论争”,固然在新文学界内部加重了宗派矛盾和意气之争,但这也逼迫着论争双方去学习马列主义著作。太阳社和我们社的存在意义并不限于“革命文学论争”本身,而是通过他们自身的崛起验证了中国左翼文学和文化崛起的历史必然性,以及左翼文学作为一种“问题”与“方法”的复杂性和多种可能性。

Sun Society and Our Society were not in“complete unanimity”as some scholars have assumed.It is precisely because of these multiple dissents that Creation Society,Sun Society and Our Society have formed three left-wing literary forces.In the course of the revolutionary literature debate,Creation Society and Sun Society criticized Crescent School and even the entire literary and art circle in their own publications.But Our Society had never attacked Lu Xun and did not intend to do that,focusing more on literary and artistic creation instead.Sun Society,taking Our Society with it,participated in the revolutionary literature debate.The cooperation of these two societies aggravated the sectarian conflicts in the new literary circle,forcing both sides to study more Marxist-Leninist works.The significance of Sun Society and Our Society lies in verifying the historical inevitability of the rise of left-wing literature and culture in China,and the complexity and possibilities of left-wing literature as a“problem”and“solution”,not simply limited to the“revolutionary literature debate”itself.