期刊文献+

从安全例外到规制合作——数字贸易中网络安全问题治理范式之转型 被引量:1

From Security Exception to Regulatory Cooperation:Paradigm Shift of Cybersecurity Governance in Digital Trade
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何兼顾数字贸易和网络安全是一项棘手难题。各国通常援引贸易协定中的安全例外条款,将违反数字贸易自由化义务的网络安全措施作为一项免责例外,但此种安全例外范式难以发挥应有作用。当前地缘经济竞争逐渐消解孕育安全例外范式的贸易和平论思潮,网络安全冲击传统国家安全观念形塑的WTO安全例外规则框架,新近缔结FTA中的数字化安全例外条款也不脱此种范式的窠臼。FTA网络安全合作规则昭示的规制合作范式契合数字贸易与网络安全之间的共存关系和互联网治理的多元利益攸关者模式。从安全例外范式转向规制合作范式要求各国就数字贸易政策去安全化形成共识,然后借助多种协调工具促进数字贸易措施的一致性。 How to balance digital trade and cybersecurity is a thorny challenge.The countries usually invoke the security exception clause in trade agreements to identify cybersecurity measures that violate digital trade liberalization obligations as the exemption from liability,but this security exception paradigm is difficult to play its due role.The current geo-economic competition is gradually dispelling the thought of peace through trade that breeds the paradigm of security exception.Cybersecurity has impacted the WTO security exception rule framework shaped by traditional national security concepts.The digitalization security exception clauses in the recently concluded FTAs still follow the beaten track.The regulatory cooperation paradigm embodied in cybersecurity cooperation rules of FTAs is in line with the coexistence relationship between digital trade and cybersecurity as well as the multi-stakeholder mode of Internet govermance.The shift from security exception paradigm to regulatory cooperation paradigm requires the countries to form a consensus on the desecuritization of digital trade policies and promote the consistency of digital trade measures with the help of a variety of coordination tools.
作者 李冬冬 LI Dongdong
机构地区 烟台大学法学院
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2023年第10期107-118,共12页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(22BFX141)。
关键词 数字贸易 网络安全 安全例外条款 网络安全合作条款 规制合作 digital trade cybersecurity security exception clause cybersecurity cooperation clause regulatory cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献160

  • 1刘国柱,史博伟.大国竞争时代美国科技创新战略及其对中国的挑战——以国家安全创新基地为中心[J].社会科学,2021(5):21-40. 被引量:19
  • 2阎学通.数字时代的中美战略竞争[J].世界政治研究,2019,0(2):1-18. 被引量:36
  • 3洪延青.“法律战”旋涡中的执法跨境调取数据:以美国、欧盟和中国为例[J].环球法律评论,2021(1):38-51. 被引量:52
  • 4[英]巴瑞·布赞 [丹麦]奥利·维夫 [丹麦]迪.怀尔德 朱宁译.《新安全论》[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2003年版.第159-189页.
  • 5[美]罗伯特·基欧汉,约瑟夫·奈著,门洪华译:《权力与相互依赖》,北京:北京大学出版社,2002年版,第257-318页
  • 6[美]温特.《国际政治的社会理论》,秦亚青译,上海:上海人民出版社2001年版.
  • 7“Internet World Stats”,http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
  • 8Leon Panetta,“Remarks by Secretary Panetta on Cybersecurity to the Business Executives for National Security”,2012,http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=5136.
  • 9“U.S.Homeland Chief:Cyber 9/11 Could Happen‘Imminently’”,Reuters,January 24,2013,http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/24/us-usa-cyber-threat-idU SBRE90N1A320130124.
  • 10James Lewis,“Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare:Assessment of National Doctrine and Organization”,in UNIDIR,The Cyber Index:International Security Trends and Realities,New York and Geneva,2013.

共引文献227

同被引文献30

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部