赵城金藏本《广弘明集》疑难字考释举例

Research on the Diffi cult Characters of Guang Hong Ming Ji(《广弘明集》)in the Version of Zhao Cheng Jin Zang(赵城金藏)

通过对赵城金藏本《广弘明集》经文中那些形体变易难以辨识和书写讹误难以发现的疑难字进行考释与研究,论文认为赵城金藏本《广弘明集》卷三“光禄大夫刘向及子仍、歆等”之“仍”当为“伋”之形误,卷一六“自非淬德潜衍”之“淬”当为“沛”之形误,卷一八“吾常以为殊太徑■”之“■”疑为“鋌”字俗讹,卷三〇“浮光映■池”之“■”当为“寶”之俗讹,卷三〇“腾波■漂客”之“■”当为“濟”之俗讹。在此基础上,提出赵城金藏本《广弘明集》疑难字考释在研究赵城金藏经文用字、整理《广弘明集》文本等方面所具有的重要价值和意义。

Through the research on the difficult characters in the scriptures of Guang Hong Ming Ji(《广弘明集》)in the version of Zhao Cheng Jin Zang,which are diffi cult to recognize due to the shape changes and the writing errors hard to fi nd,the paper believes that the character reng(仍)in the sentence guanglu dafu Liu Xiang ji zi Reng,Xin deng(光禄大夫刘向及子仍、歆等)in Volume 3 of Guang Hong Ming Ji(《广弘明集》)in the version of Zhao Cheng Jin Zang should be regarded as a form error of ji(伋),the character cui(淬)in the sentence zi fei cui de qian yan(自非淬德潜衍)in Volume 16 should be regarded as a form error of pei(沛),the character in■the sentence wu chang yiwei shu tai jingting(吾常以为殊太徑■)in Volume 18 is suspected to be a common misconception of ting(鋌),the character■in the sentence fuguang ying baochi(浮光映■池)in Volume 30 is suspected to be a common misconception of bao(寶),and the character■in the sentence tengbo ji piaoke(腾波■in the sentence tengbo ji piaoke(腾波漂客)in Volume 30 is suspected to be a common misconception of ji(濟).On this basis,the paper puts forward the important value and signifi cance of the research on the diffi cult characters in Guang Hong Ming Ji(《广弘明集》)in the version of Zhao Cheng Jin Zang in studying the characters used in Zhao Cheng Jin Zang and sorting out the text of Guang Hong Ming Ji(《广弘明集》).