期刊文献+

基于证据理论的软件项目风险评估方法

A Software Project Risk Assessment Method Based on Evidence Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对专家模糊评判语言导致风险评估结果可信性降低的问题,提出一种基于证据理论的软件项目风险评估方法。该方法首先将专家评估值转化为基本概率分配(BPA),其次使用基于相似系数优化的证据合成方法进行数据融合,并根据风险矩阵得出风险优先级。此外,相似系数可以作为复盘专家评估值相互支持情况的辅助决策依据。通过算例验证了该方法的实用性和可行性,通过与模糊理论、熵权法及TODIM方法进行对比分析,进一步验证和展现该方法在运算过程、权重分配方法以及处理冲突信息方面具备的客观性和优越性。 Aiming at the problem of reduced credibility of risk assessment results due to the fuzzy judgment language of experts,this paper proposes a software project risk assessment method based on evidence theory.Firstly,in this paper,expert assessment values are transformed into basic probability assignments(BPA),and secondly an evidence synthesis method based on similarity coefficient optimization is used for data fusion,and risk priorities based on a risk matrix are derived.In addition,the similarity coefficient can be used as an auxiliary decision basis for reviewing the mutual support of expert assessment values.The practicality and feasibility of the method are verified through the arithmetic examples,and the objectivity and superiority of the method in the arithmetic process,weight allocation method and handling of conflicting information are further verified and demonstrated through the comparative analysis with the fuzzy theory,entropy weighting method and TODIM method.
作者 宫磊 任向红 寇玺 洪宪文 GONG Lei;REN Xianghong;KOU Xi;HONG Xianwen(Rocket Force University of Engineering,Xi'an 710025,China)
机构地区 火箭军工程大学
出处 《软件工程》 2023年第12期17-23,共7页 Software Engineering
关键词 软件项目 风险评估 证据理论 software project risk assessment evidence theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1高翔,祝跃飞,刘胜利,费金龙,刘龙.基于模糊Petri网的网络风险评估模型[J].通信学报,2013,34(S1):126-132. 被引量:13
  • 2潘梅森,颜君颜.基于LVQ的软件项目风险评估模型的研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2006,42(12):126-130. 被引量:7
  • 3赵宏霞,杨皎平.基于模糊识别的软件项目风险评估[J].技术经济与管理研究,2007(4):52-53. 被引量:10
  • 4Hwang C L, Yoon K. Muhiple attribute decision making: methods and applications[ M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  • 5Simon H A. Administrative behavior[ M]. Glencoe: Free Press, 1976.
  • 6Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgement under uncertainty : heuristics and biases [ J ]. Science, 1974, 185 (4157) : 1124-1131.
  • 7Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory : an analysis of decision under risk[ J ]. Econometrica, 1979, 47 (2) : 263-291.
  • 8Fan Z P, Zhang X, Chen F D, Liu Y. Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels: a method based on prospect theory [ J ]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013, 65 (2) : 341-350.
  • 9Lahdelmaa R, Salminen P. Prospect theory and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis(SMAA) [ J]. Omega, 2009, 37 (5) : 961-971.
  • 10Gomes L F A M, Lima M M P P. TODIM: basic and application to muhicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts[ J]. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 1992, 16 (4): 113-127.

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部