期刊文献+

为何照顾会出错?——残障照顾中“依赖-独立”之辩 被引量:1

Why Does Care Go Wrong?The Debate on“Dependence/Independence”in Disability Care
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在照顾的实践中,围绕老龄化和残障的叙述,存在着显而易见的矛盾:在老龄化领域,照顾往往被理解为爱和利他主义,是对自我关怀的延伸;然而在残障领域,照顾却经常与控制、压迫、机构化和虐待有关。为何照顾在残障领域出错了?本文重点讨论残障领域对“照顾”概念所发起的辩论与挑战:一方面,通过女性主义视角和残障社群的对话,以说明现行关于残障的论述在理解残障者的经验方面并不充分,这导致残障人士作为受照顾者所经历的问题被忽视了;另一方面,在充分尊重残障人士对自主生活诉求的同时,需要用女性主义的关怀伦理来平衡“照顾—控制”与“依赖—独立”的二分论述。最后,文化是照顾中不可忽视的重要因素,在未来的研究中,需要对中国的照顾文化脉络进行深入挖掘,进一步探索根植于中国文化内涵的照顾实践。 In the delivery of support to people with disability and the aged,there is ambivalence surrounding“care”in the literature on aging and disability.In aging literature,care is often portrayed as an act of love and altruism,a selfless extension of oneself to ease another’s burden.However,within the disability community,care frequently carries connotations of control,oppression,institutionalization,and even abuse.Why does care go wrong in the disability field?This paper focuses on the debates and challenges to the concept of“care”in the field of disability:on the one hand,through a dialogue between feminist theory and the disability community,in order to show that current discourses on disability are inadequate in understanding the experiences of people with disabilities,which leads to the neglect of issues in the experiences of people with disabilities as care recipients;on the other hand,an ethic of care is needed to balance the dichotomy between“care/control”and“dependence/independence”,while fully respecting disabled people’s aspirations for independent and selfdirected living.
作者 莫佳妮 Mo Jiani
出处 《社会建设》 CSSCI 2023年第6期49-67,共19页 Social Construction
关键词 残障 照顾 女性主义 关怀伦理 disability care feminism ethics of care
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献108

  • 1Leading Group of the Second China National Sample Survey on Disability, National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China.2006年第二次全国残疾人抽样调查主要数据公报[J].中国康复理论与实践,2006,12(12):1013-1013. 被引量:157
  • 2福山,弗朗西斯.2015.大断裂:人类本性与社会秩序的重建[M].唐磊,译.广西:广西师范大学出版社.
  • 3奥利弗,迈克尔、鲍勃·萨佩.2009.残疾人社会工作(第二版)[M].高巍、尹明,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
  • 4王国羽.2008.联合国身心障碍者权利公约对台湾的启示[J].社区发展季刊,(123):106-116.
  • 5Barnes, Colin. 1991. Disabled People n Britain and Dscrimination: A Case .(or Anti-discrimination Legislation. London: Hurst and Co. in association with the British Council of Organisations of Disabled People.
  • 6Barnes, Colin and Geoff Mercer. (eds.) 1996. Exploring the Divide.. Illness and Disability. Leeds.. the Disability Press.
  • 7Barnes, Colin and Geoff Mercer. (eds.) 1997. Doing Disability Research. Leeds: the Disability Press.
  • 8Barnes, Colin, Geoff Mercer and Tom Shakespeare. 1999. Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 9Berkowitz, Edward. 1987. Disabled Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Bickenbach, Jerone E., et al. 1999. "Models of disablement, Universalism and theInternational Classification of Impairments, Disability and Handicaps. "Social Science and Medicine 48(9) .. 1173 - 1183.

同被引文献20

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部