期刊文献+

建筑施工企业辱虐管理行为对员工绩效水平的影响研究

Research on the Influence of Abusive Management onEmployee Performance In Construction Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于资源保存理论,应用中介效应检验的Bootstrap方法,以安全氛围感知能力为中介变量,通过对建筑施工企业员工进行问卷调查,探讨了辱虐管理行为对员工绩效水平的影响。研究发现:辱虐管理行为对员工绩效水平存在明显的负相关影响;安全氛围感知能力在辱虐管理行为与员工绩效水平之间起到中介作用的同时,在感知合作能力、感知创新能力和感知公平能力3个维度均对员工绩效水平产生正向影响。根据实证结果,从管理者与员工两个层面提出了提升员工绩效水平的建议。 Based on the resource conservation theory,Bootstrap method of mediating effect test was applied to investigate the effect of abusive management on employee performance through a questionnaire survey of employees in construction companies,using perception of safety climate as a mediating variable.It was found that:there was a significant negative effect of abusive management on employee performance;perception of safety climate mediated between abusive management and employee performance,while three dimensions of perceived cooperation,perceived innovation and perceived fairness all had positive effects on employee performance.Based on the empirical results,suggestions for improving employee performance levels are proposed at both manager and employee levels.
作者 刘明 汪顺兴 LIU Ming;WANG Shunxing(School of Management Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266500,China)
出处 《沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第5期472-478,共7页 Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Social Science
基金 山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2021QG046) 2022年度青岛市社会科学规划研究项目(QDSKL2201185)。
关键词 辱虐管理行为 员工绩效水平 安全氛围感知能力 BOOTSTRAP方法 abusive supervision employee performance security perception bootstrap method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

  • 1王鉴忠,李琦,宋君卿,刘建华.积极组织行为学视角下辱虐管理与员工乐观解释风格对离职倾向的影响研究[J].管理学报,2020,17(5):688-696. 被引量:19
  • 2马戎.“差序格局”——中国传统社会结构和中国人行为的解读[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,44(2):131-142. 被引量:143
  • 3[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 4[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 5[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 6[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 7[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 8[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 9[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 10[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64

共引文献7686

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部