期刊文献+

工作场所中断测量量表的汉化及在护士中的信效度检验

Translation of the Workplace Interruption Measurement Scale and its reliability and validity testing among nurses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的汉化工作场所中断测量量表,并在临床护士中检验其信效度。方法基于Beaton量表翻译指南对英文版工作场所中断测量量表进行翻译及跨文化调适,形成中文版量表,并用于调查478名临床护士,以检验中文版量表的信度和效度。结果中文版工作场所中断测量量表包括4个维度,共12个条目。探索性因子分析共提取4个因子,累计方差贡献率为77.079%,验证性因子结果显示,χ2/df=1.831,RMSEA=0.058,CFI=0.980,TLI=0.973,RMR=0.043,IFI=0.980,GFI=0.946;条目水平的内容效度指数为0.800~1.000,量表水平的内容效度指数为0.983;量表的Cronbach′sα为0.909,Spearman-Brown分半系数为0.760,重测信度为0.788。结论中文版工作场所中断测量量表信效度良好,可作为护士工作中断的测评工具。 Objective To translate an English version of the Workplace Interruption Measurement Scale into Chinese and to assess the reliability and validity of Chinese version as a tool for measuring workplace interruptions in nurses′workplaces.Methods This study translated,back-translated,and cross-culturally debugged the English version of the Workplace Interruption Measurement Scale based on the Benton Scale Translation Guide to form a Chinese version.A total of 478 nurses were selected for the survey using convenience sampling to test the reliability and validity of the scale.Results The Chinese version of the Workplace Interruption Measurement Scale consisted of four dimensions and 12 items.Exploratory factor analysis extracted four factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 77.079%,and validation factor results showedχ2/df=1.831,RMSEA=0.058,CFI=0.98,TLI=0.973,RMR=0.043,IFI=0.980,GFI=0.946.The content validity of the scale was I-CVI of 0.800-1.000,S-CVI was 0.983.Cronbach′s alpha for the scale was 0.909,Spearman-Brown splithalf coefficient was 0.760,and the retest reliability was 0.788.Conclusion The Chinese version of the Workplace Interruption Measurement Scale has good reliability and validity and can be used as a survey tool for the subjective assessment of work interruption for nurses.
作者 德宗 刘云访 许晓华 李素云 皮蓉 何子涵 林玲 De Zong;Liu Yunfang;Xu Xiaohua;Li Suyun;Pi Rong;He Zihan;Lin Ling(Nursing Department,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China)
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第22期61-64,共4页 Journal of Nursing Science
关键词 护士 工作中断 工作场所中断测量量表 信度 效度 护理管理 nurses work interruptions Workplace Interruption Measure Scale reliability validity nursing management
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献41

  • 1Jianfei Xie,Qian Sun,Siyuan Tang,Siqing Ding,Zhuqing Zhong,Sainan Zeng,Yinglong Duan,Xiangyan Zhang,Andy SK.Cheng.Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding nursing interruptions among Chinese nurses: A nationwide cross-sectional survey[J].International Journal of Nursing Sciences,2020,7(1):66-73. 被引量:8
  • 2周志成,朱月龙.团队领导行为对团队效能影响之研究[J].应用心理学,2005,11(2):181-185. 被引量:30
  • 3Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 4Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 5Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 6Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 7Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 8Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 9Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.

共引文献1091

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部