我国药品犯罪的立法转型及其教义学分析

Legislative Transformation and Dogmatic Analysis of Drug Crime in China

我国药品犯罪的刑事立法经历了独立、从属、相对独立的过程;《刑法修正案(十一)》对药品犯罪的条文作了修改,使假药、劣药的认定标准相对独立,并增设了“提供假(劣)药罪”“妨害药品管理罪”和“药品监管渎职罪”,实现了刑行的有序衔接,完善了药品安全管理的规范体系。对于假药、劣药的教义学分析与认定,既要体现刑事违法的独立价值,也要参照前置性的《药品管理法》而作出实质性的理解,还须准确界定提供假(劣)药罪中的提供行为;且妨害药品管理罪所侵犯的,应当是有主次之分的双重法益。

The criminal legislation of drug crime in China has experienced a process of independence,subordi-nation and relative independence.The Criminal Law Amendment(XI)has made amendment to the drug-related provisions,making the identification of counterfeit drugs and inferior drugs relatively independent,and has added the crime of offering counterfeit(inferior)drugs,the crime of impairing drug administration and the crime of derelic-tion of duty in drug supervision,realizing the orderly connection between criminal law and administrative law,and improving the drug-related criminal law normative system.The doctrinal analysis and identification of counterfeit drugs and inferior drugs should not only reflect the independent value of criminal violation,but also make a substan-tive understanding with reference to the prepositional Drug Administration Law,and accurately define the act of pro-viding counterfeit(inferior)drugs.What is infringed by the crime of interfering with drug administration should be a double legal interest with primary and secondary division.