GLIM标准与SGA在神经外科重症病人营养不良诊断中应用的观察性研究

Observational study of GLIM standard and SGA in the diagnosis of severe malnutrition in neurosurgery patients

目的:比较GLIM标准和SGA两种营养不良评定工具在神经外科重症病人营养不良诊断中的应用。方法:按随机抽样,选取2023年1月至2023年4月入住广州市南方医科大学珠江医院神经创伤重症科42例病人,分别采用GLIM标准和SGA量表两种营养评定工具进行营养状态评估,比较GLIM标准和SGA量表诊断营养不良的情况。结果:①病人NRS 2002评分≥3分,营养筛查风险的阳性率为100%(42/42)。②采用GLIM标准诊断的营养不良病人有13例,阳性率30.95%。采用SGA诊断营养不良29例,阳性率69.05%。③GLIM标准和SGA量表评定营养不良结果的Kappa值为0.372,两种营养状态评估工具诊断的结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:神经重症外科病人营养风险高,在GLIM标准下营养不良发生率低,SGA标准下营养不良发生率高,GLIM标准和SGA标准的结果一致性较差。

Objective:To compare the application of GLIM and SGA in diagnosing malnutrition among severe neurosurgery patients.Methods:According to random sampling,42 patients admitted to the intensive care unit of Department of Neurotrauma in a Grade-A hospital in Guangzhou from January 2023 to April 2023 were screened.The nutritional status was assessed using GLIM standard and SGA scale,respectively.GLIM criteria and SGA scale were compared in the diagnosis of malnutrition.Results:The patients'NRS 2002 score was(3.90±1.10),and the positive rate of nutritional screening risk was 100%(42/42).13 patients were diagnosed as malnutrition by GLIM criteria,with a positive rate of 30.95%.29 cases were diagnosed as malnutrition by SGA,and the positive rate was 69.05%.The Kappa value of GLIM standard and SGA scale for malnutrition was 0.372,and the difference between the two nutritional status assessment tools was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Patients receiving neurocritical surgery had high nutritional risk and had a low incidence of malnutrition under GLIM criteria,while a high incidence of malnutrition under SGA criteria.Moreover,the results of GLIM criteria and SGA were not consistent in the assessment of malnutrition.