期刊文献+

微波理疗联合中频治疗仪及推拿对腰椎间盘突出症患者腰椎功能及疼痛程度的影响 被引量:2

Effect of Microwave Physiotherapy Combined with Medium Frequency Therapeutic Apparatus and Massage on Lumbar Function and Degree of Pain in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨微波理疗联合中频治疗仪及推拿在腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2020年10月—2021年12月南昌市按摩医院收治的70例LDH患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各35例。两组均采取牵引治疗,在此基础上对照组予以中频治疗仪联合推拿进行治疗,观察组采用微波理疗联合中频治疗仪及推拿进行治疗,两组治疗均持续3个疗程。对比两组临床疗效、腰椎功能、腰椎疼痛程度、下肢步态、下肢运动功能及疗法安全性。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为94.29%,高于对照组的77.14%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组腰椎功能、腰椎疼痛程度、下肢步态、下肢运动功能比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组日本矫形外科学会(JOA)下腰痛评分表评分[(23.41±2.20)分]、Tinetti步态分析量表(TGA)评分[(9.15±0.63)分]、下肢Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(FMA)评分[(28.33±2.29)分]均高于对照组的(19.99±2.75)、(7.42±0.87)、(24.16±3.38)分,简化麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)中的疼痛评定指数(PRI)评分[(14.01±2.22)分]、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分[(1.10±0.24)分]、现时疼痛强度(PPI)评分[(1.55±0.19)分]均低于对照组的(18.33±2.72)、(1.63±0.32)、(2.02±0.23)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗期间均未见不良反应。结论:微波理疗联合中频治疗仪及推拿治疗LDH效果更好,能够改善腰椎功能,减轻疼痛程度,促进下肢功能恢复。 Objective:To investigate the effect of microwave physiotherapy combined with medium frequency therapeutic apparatus and massage in patients with lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Method:A total of 70 patients with LDH who were admitted to Nanchang Massage Hospital from October 2020 to December 2021 were selected and divided into the control group and the observation group according to the random number table method,with 35 cases in each group.Both groups were treated with traction,on this basis,the control group was treated with medium frequency therapeutic apparatus combined with massage,and the observation group was treated with microwave physiotherapy combined with medium frequency therapeutic apparatus and massage.Both groups were treated for 3 courses.The clinical efficacy,lumbar function,lumbar pain degree,lower limb gait,lower limb motor function and treatment safety of the two groups were compared.Result:The total effective rate of the observation group was 94.29%,which was higher than 77.14%of the control group,with a statistical difference(P<0.05).Before treatment,there were no significant differences between the two groups in lumbar function,lumbar pain degree,lower limb gait and lower limb motor function(P>0.05);after treatment,the Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)low back pain rating scale score[(23.41±2.20)points],Tinetti gait analysis scale(TGA)score[(9.15±0.63)points]and lower limb Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment scale(FMA)score[(28.33±2.29)points]in the observation group were higher than(19.99±2.75),(7.42±0.87)and(24.16±3.38)points in the control group,the pain rating index(PRI)score[(14.01±2.22)points],visual analogue scale(VAS)score[(1.10±0.24)points],and present pain intensity(PPI)score[(1.55±0.19)points]in the short form McGill pain questionnaire(SF-MPQ)were lower than(18.33±2.72),(1.63±0.32),(2.02±0.23)points in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).No adverse reactions were observed in both two groups during treatment.Conclusion:Microwave physiotherapy combined with medium frequency therapeutic apparatus and massage has a better effect in the treatment of LDH,which can improve the function of lumbar spine,reduce the degree of pain,and promote the recovery of lower limb function.
作者 胡军 HU Jun(Nanchang Massage Hospital,Nanchang 330006,China)
机构地区 南昌市按摩医院
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2023年第31期118-122,共5页 Medical Innovation of China
基金 江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目(20200636)。
关键词 腰椎间盘突出症 微波理疗 中频治疗仪 推拿 腰椎功能 疼痛程度 Lumbar disc herniation Microwave physiotherapy Medium frequency therapeutic apparatus Massage Lumbar function Degree of pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献232

  • 1陈君,石凤英,李泽萍,钱颖.预测老年人跌倒危险的平衡和步态功能性评定研究进展[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(9):713-715. 被引量:55
  • 2Brunnstrom S.Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia:based on sequential recovery stages[J].Phys Ther,1966,46:357-375.
  • 3Lindmark B,Hamrin E.Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention.Presentation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment and its reliability[J].Scand J Rehabil Med,1988,20:103-109.
  • 4Streiner DL,Norman GR.Health measurement scales:a practical guide to their development and use[M].2nd ed.New York:Oxford Medical Publications,1995.
  • 5Taub E.Constraint-induced movement therapy and massed practice[J].Stroke,2000,31:986-988.
  • 6Aisen ML,Krebs HI,Hogan N,et al.The effect of robotassisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke[J].Arch Neurol,1997,54:443-446.
  • 7Fasoli SE,Krebs HI,Stein J,et al.Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke:Follow-up results[J].ArchPhys Med Rehabil,2004,85:1106-1111.
  • 8Fasoli SE,Krebs HI,Stein J,et al.Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2003,84:477-482.
  • 9Ferraro M,Demaio JH,Krol J,et al.Assessing the motor status score:a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke[J].Neurorehabil Neural Repair,2002,16:283-289.
  • 10Fugl-Meyer AR,Jaasko L,Leyman I,et al.The poststroke hemiplegic patient.1.a method for evaluation of physical performance[J].Scand J Rehabil Med,1975,7:13-31.

共引文献507

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部