社会法视域下法教义学的推陈出新

On the Innovation of Legal Dogmatics from the Perspective of Social Law

法教义学以推陈出新的面目进入社会法研究领域时,分化出中德不同语境的两种法教义学。德国在新旧并存的法律体制下,“法官法”与概括条款相结合,劳动法教义学出现了新特点,以一种社会介入的方式来发挥作用,冲突的价值在相互的妥协中实现动态平衡,从而保持社会利益的导向。我国改革开放中,社会法是法律秩序新老交替中出现的法律门类,合同法与基准法相结合也催生了新的研究范式,平衡保护涉及内容、主体、程序定位,应当实行低标准、广覆盖、严执法。民法特别法与独立社会法,都是治理社会问题而产生的现代法律现象。沿着辛茨海默的理论轨迹,法教义学只有脱虚向实,分别置于产生观点的学术语境中,才能使人们理解社会化背景下法教义学的当代意义。

When Dogmatics entered the research field of social law with a new face,it divided into two kinds in China and Germany where the contexts are different.In Germany,under the coexistence of old and new legal systems,judge-made law is combined with general clauses,and new features have emerged in the dogmatics of labor law,which plays its role in a way of social intervention.The conflicting values achieve a dynamic balance in mutual compromise so as to maintain the orientation of social interests.In China’s reform and opening up,social law is a legal category that appears during the shift from the new legal order to old legal order,and the combination of contract law and standard law has also given rise to a new research paradigm.The equitable protection involves content,subject and procedure,thus low standards,wide coverage and strict enforcement should be implemented.Both the special law of civil law and the independent social law are contemporary legal phenomena produced in the course of governing social issues.Following Sinzheimer’s theoretical track,only when dogmatics is devoted from the virtual to the real and placed in the academic contexts of producing viewpoints can the contemporary significance of legal dogmatics against the backgro und of the socialization be understood.